Black Caviar at Royal Ascot Saturday AM

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie

Groovy the best dirt sprinter you ever saw? I really didn't think there was anyone left who thought that.

Who was better?

[Calzone Lord]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

Who was better?

He will tell you Phone Trick.

Nevermind the fact that they met on the track.

http://www.nytimes.com/1986/07/21/sp...s-victory.html

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by Calzone Lord

He will tell you Phone Trick.

Nevermind the fact that they met on the track.

http://www.nytimes.com/1986/07/21/sp...s-victory.html

Dude, I was there.

Phone Trick was great as well.

[Calzone Lord]

I wasn't

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by Calzone Lord

I wasn't

Were you even born yet.

[Calzone Lord]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

Were you even born yet.

Yes.

As a matter of fact -- at birth, I wasn't delivered in a traditional manner -- rather, I JUMPED out of the womb, on my way to doing a 360 up in the doctor's face, and in doing so, I impressed the nurse* to no end with my smoooove game, making it a simple matter to get those panties off, and drop the hammer with my erect since day one instrument of female bliss.

From that moment on, I knew I was destined for Internet greatness.

* - OK...so she was a little chunky. I was young, cut me some fucl<ing slack

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

Who was better?

Chinook Pass

Midnight Lute

[Calzone Lord]

Originally Posted by v j stauffer

Chinook Pass

Very doubtful. He was 0-for-3 lifetime in Graded Stakes races and got caught at Los Al in his California debut.

Maybe the fastest horse for a quarter mile or half mile of all-time -- but he does not belong in the discussion of all-time top dirt sprinters IMO.

Originally Posted by Calzone Lord

Very doubtful. He was 0-for-3 lifetime in Graded Stakes races and got caught at Los Al in his California debut.

Maybe the fastest horse for a quarter mile or half mile of all-time -- but he does not belong in the discussion of all-time top dirt sprinters IMO.

Laffit Pincay told me he was not only the best sprinter he ever rode, but one of the best horses period.

I think he very much does belong in that discussion.

[Calzone Lord]

Pincay Jr. is a jockey. Chinook Pass never won a Graded Stakes race. He was just 1-for-5 lifetime beyond 6.5 furlongs. He was a run-off speed horse.

Here is the lifetime record of Chinook Pass when he had a lead of 1.5 lengths or less at the 1st call.

June 27th 1981: Washington Bred maiden race at Long Acres. Chinook Pass leads by 1.5 lengths at 1st call. Wins by 2 lengths.

Aug 30th 1981: Gottstein Futurity for Washington Breds at Long Acres: Chinook Pass led by only a half length at the 1st call -- he finished 11th beaten 17 lengths.

April 10th 1982: $3,000 Allowance race at Portland Meadows. Chinook Pass led by only 1 length after the 1st call. He won the race by one length.

July 5th 1982: Seattle Slew handicap at Long Acres. Chinook Pass led by just a head at the 1st call. He finished last of 14 and was eased in the stretch.

Aug 22nd 1982: Long Acres Mile. Chinook Pass leads by just a half length at the 1st call. Finishes 2nd.

Nov 14th 1982: National Sprint Challenge Division 2: Chinook Pass had a poor start and didn't make the lead. Finished 3rd.

Jan 2nd 1983: Malibu Stakes at Santa Anita. Chinook Pass leads by 1.5 lengths at the 1st call. Finishes 6th beaten 16 lengths.

Mar 13th 1983: Phoenix Gold Cup at Turf Paradise: Chinook Pass is only in front by a head at the 1st call. Finishes 5th at odds of 2/5.

Just a record of 8-2-1-0. One of the two wins came in a Washington Bred maiden race. The other came in a $3,000 allowance race at Portland Meadows.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by Calzone Lord

Pincay Jr. is a jockey. Chinook Pass never won a Graded Stakes race. He was just 1-for-5 lifetime beyond 6.5 furlongs. He was a run-off speed horse.

Here is the lifetime record of Chinook Pass when he had a lead of 1.5 lengths or less at the 1st call.

June 27th 1981: Washington Bred maiden race at Long Acres. Chinook Pass leads by 1.5 lengths at 1st call. Wins by 2 lengths.

Aug 30th 1981: Gottstein Futurity for Washington Breds at Long Acres: Chinook Pass led by only a half length at the 1st call -- he finished 11th beaten 17 lengths.

April 10th 1982: $3,000 Allowance race at Portland Meadows. Chinook Pass led by only 1 length after the 1st call. He won the race by one length.

July 5th 1982: Seattle Slew handicap at Long Acres. Chinook Pass led by just a head at the 1st call. He finished last of 14 and was eased in the stretch.

Aug 22nd 1982: Long Acres Mile. Chinook Pass leads by just a half length at the 1st call. Finishes 2nd.

Nov 14th 1982: National Sprint Challenge Division 2: Chinook Pass had a poor start and didn't make the lead. Finished 3rd.

Jan 2nd 1983: Malibu Stakes at Santa Anita. Chinook Pass leads by 1.5 lengths at the 1st call. Finishes 6th beaten 16 lengths.

Mar 13th 1983: Phoenix Gold Cup at Turf Paradise: Chinook Pass is only in front by a head at the 1st call. Finishes 5th at odds of 2/5.

Just a record of 8-2-1-0. One of the two wins came in a Washington Bred maiden race. The other came in a $3,000 allowance race at Portland Meadows.

He was clearly in the class of Groovy and Phone Trick.

[Indian Charlie]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

He was clearly in the class of Groovy and Phone Trick.

Especially as a four year old.

Anyone who ever saw that horse run when he was older knew they were watching greatness.

I'd like to have seen Ack Ack run. Were you ever so lucky to see him race?

[Indian Charlie]

Originally Posted by Calzone Lord

Very doubtful. He was 0-for-3 lifetime in Graded Stakes races and got caught at Los Al in his California debut.

Maybe the fastest horse for a quarter mile or half mile of all-time -- but he does not belong in the discussion of all-time top dirt sprinters IMO.

You speak in ignorance with this one. The graded stakes race thing is meaningless. Racing was different back then (the way stakes were structured) and quite a few of those listed stakes are now graded. It's too bad you've never seen video of him run.

[Indian Charlie]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

Who was better?

Phone Trick, as Salami will no doubt say I am going to say. PT lost because of the instructions Mandella gave Pincay and he's blamed himself ever since.

Groovy, on a loose lead, was damn tough, but he was not the most consistent or gamest horse ever.

On the Line, once Lukas figured him out, was awesome. Lit De Justice ran races that could take your breath away.

I'd say those three, on their best days, would beat Groovy on his best day.

One could make cases for horses like Kona Gold, Chinook Pass, maybe Reraise (who knows how good he may have been?).

Phone Trick though? Wow.

[RolloTomasi]

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie

Phone Trick, as Salami will no doubt say I am going to say. PT lost because of the instructions Mandella gave Pincay and he's blamed himself ever since.

Jorge Velasquez rode Phone Trick in NY.

Groovy, on a loose lead, was damn tough, but he was not the most consistent or gamest horse ever.

Groovy won 10 of 15 starts when he began sprinting in earnest. One of those defeats was in the Jerome going 8f. He beat the older Phone Trick as a 3yo before he was well-established.

On the Line, once Lukas figured him out, was awesome.

On The Line was running in route races all the way to the end of his career. For good reason, he did well in many of them.

Lit De Justice ran races that could take your breath away.

That horse could barely win 2 races in a row. Great turn of foot when he actually used it.

[Indian Charlie]

Originally Posted by RolloTomasi

Jorge Velasquez rode Phone Trick in NY.


Groovy won 10 of 15 starts when he began sprinting in earnest. One of those defeats was in the Jerome going 8f. He beat the older Phone Trick as a 3yo before he was well-established.


On The Line was running in route races all the way to the end of his career. For good reason, he did well in many of them.


That horse could barely win 2 races in a row. Great turn of foot when he actually used it.

My bad on the jockey in NY. It was like 27 years ago and my take on jockeys are that they are mostly useless.

Everyone knew Groovy was a sprinter. Maybe you meant dedicated sprinter. He beat Phone Trick because Mandella thought it best to concede the lead to Groovy. Groovy didn't fare well when hooked by a quality speed horse, or worse, if he was forced to chase a quality speed horse.

On the Line was a sprinter by the end of his career. There is no doubt about that.

And yeah, Lit de Justice was a freaking nut case. When he fired, he was just about unbeatable (provided Nak didn't give him too awful a ride/trip).

I'm not saying Groovy wasn't a great sprinter. I just feel that there are a number of sprinters, that if all were on their best that day, would beat him.

[RolloTomasi]

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie

On the Line was a sprinter by the end of his career. There is no doubt about that.

On The Line's last 3 starts before his ill-fated BC Sprint were at a mile or more.

[Indian Charlie]

Originally Posted by RolloTomasi

On The Line's last 3 starts before his ill-fated BC Sprint were at a mile or more.

True, but Lukas was a freaking idiot. On The Line was clearly a better sprinter, he just happened to be a pretty good versatile runner.

If you like, I'll post On The Line's lifetime PPs.

[King Glorious]

King Glorious was pretty damn fast too. Set a track record in his debut. Set a stakes record in his second start. Ran a 1:08 4/5 at Hollywood in his third. Ran 1:21 1/5 at Hollywood to just miss a track record in his fourth. The DRF reported at the time that it equaled the second fastest time ever for a 2yo.

Lost in the Fog is forgotten but he ran some really fast races. He may have been sub-1:07 twice. Olympic Prospect was another pretty fast one. At his best, Artax deserves a mention. He should have been horse of the year in 1999.

[Revidere]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

Who was better?

Pine Tree Lane?