Another Obama brilliant move

[brianwspencer]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

"You" is not usually taken as a generic designation

And "if" is not usually taken to be a condemnation.

If you're of the mind that the govt. helping the poor eat is a bad idea altogether, then surely they're a bad idea

Which was a rather reasonable thing to ask, considering the kinds of things that get said around here about helping the poor by some other people.

So "if" you're of the mind that govt. helping poor people at is a bad idea is what I said.

Apparently you're not, so that portion no longer applies to you. No need to get all defensive about it and call a completely reasonable "if" "petty."

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

And "if" is not usually taken to be a condemnation.



Which was a rather reasonable thing to ask, considering the kinds of things that get said around here about helping the poor by some other people.

So "if" you're of the mind that govt. helping poor people at is a bad idea is what I said.

Apparently you're not, so that portion no longer applies to you. No need to get all defensive about it and call a completely reasonable "if" "petty."

I only think its okay to a certain extent. its way to easy for fraud situations and it should only be offered for a minimal amount of time to help people back on their feet.

of course for people with disabilities I have a completely supportive view.