Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Let me be clear, I don't want to make it out as though I am defending any of these people because they are all guilty of serious transgressions. Personally I have no problem with intervention from authorities if the rules/law and penalties are clear and applied across the board, not just cherry picking bit players at a C level track. However I have little confidence that this will be the case as there is no reason to expect that Federal prosecutors in other jurisdictions will have any desire to get involved with horseracing regulation. My other concern is that the broad interpretation concerning wire acts makes non-intentional medication violations into criminal acts, perhaps not felonies but misdemeanors and that will more or less kill off most of racing. Trainers will simply not be able to accept the risk under the current system of testing and oversight.
|
Maybe to combat the risk is to eliminate some of the medicating that is happening?
Do you think there is any link between the recent House panel on medication and the willingness to look into what happened at Penn?
and yes your post sure seem to suggest there is some sort of witch hunt going on.