![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
That would be 98% 145 out of 207 Democratic Representatives voted yes for the Patriot Act That would be 70% So please explain to me how I was "demonstrably" wrong? 8 out of 10 Democratic Congressmen voted FOR the Patriot act including 98% of the Senators yet you want to contest my statement? LOL |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Oh, and include the renewal of the Patriot Acts' three provisions - who was against that? And I'll point out that once again, as is your wont, you've avoided discussing the question, and created a false straw man diversion. Can't debate the subject, huh? Here was the comment you were trying to answer by changing the subject to the Patriot Act. Quote:
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
no, the patriot act was most definitely something passed by both parties. not just one, and certainly not just the other. a disgrace that belongs too all our wonderful leaders. yep, they know what's best for us peons. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Tell that to Chuck. He thinks it was a Democratic thing. I was the one that posted the article link about how all branches of government, and all parties, have been corroding our rights. You know, I'm "one of those people".
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
GOP.tv remember? |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I give up. You have no reading comprehension.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Actually I understand completely what you are trying to say which is why I post in the political section
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
She refuses to admit that the Democrats voted overwhelmingly FOR the Patriot Act. No one ever made any insinuation other than that despite Riot's attempt to twist.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
yes, i know.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Of course then you deflect to the Tea Party which has nothing to do with the Patriot act or those who passed it. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's pretty apparent you can't follow a thread. But if trying to insult me as a "mentally deficient radical" makes you feel smart, have at it.
Quote:
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nobody declined to talk about the Patriot Act. You mentioned it, then went into a paragraph of personal insults. Your posts are black and white. You don't post to talk about politics.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
would you consider calling folks jackasses a personal insult?
|