Frankel

[NTamm1215]

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie

I can think of others as well, based on what I've seen, that I think would have beaten Frankel.

Hell, a totally healthy Uncle Mo, if he was equally capable on grass (I know, I know, he's likely done), I think Frankel would have had a big disadvantage going against a horse with Mo's ability and style.

How on Earth could Frankel possibly have handled Dubai Millenium?

Even the most unabashed Uncle Mo fan should be realistic enough to know that Frankel would destroy him.

[Indian Charlie]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

Even the most unabashed Uncle Mo fan should be realistic enough to know that Frankel would destroy him.

IF, and these are big ifs, granted, but if Mo had no physical issues and took to grass as well as dirt, I'd say there's no freaking way on Earth Frankel destroys him.

In fact, based on what I've seen from Frankel, it's likely if those two faced each other going a mile on turf (again, Mo would have to be the same horse he was), Mo would run Frankel into submission.

Yeah, sure, if Frankel got 2 going 48.3, he would be tough, but if they went head to head in a quick pace duel, Frankel wouldn't finish in the same zip code.

You should go watch Frankel's previous race. That race is very telling, and unlike most people, I think making the jockey the scapegoat for that performance is ridiculous.

[NTamm1215]

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie

IF, and these are big ifs, granted, but if Mo had no physical issues and took to grass as well as dirt, I'd say there's no freaking way on Earth Frankel destroys him.

In fact, based on what I've seen from Frankel, it's likely if those two faced each other going a mile on turf (again, Mo would have to be the same horse he was), Mo would run Frankel into submission.

Yeah, sure, if Frankel got 2 going 48.3, he would be tough, but if they went head to head in a quick pace duel, Frankel wouldn't finish in the same zip code.

You should go watch Frankel's previous race. That race is very telling, and unlike most people, I think making the jockey the scapegoat for that performance is ridiculous.

You are admittedly someone who doesn't wager on racing anymore and whose opinions are based primarily on progeny of Indian Charlie, Indian Charlie himself and your friend who owns Lubash. Your thinking is so one-dimensional when it comes to any of those topics that it's futile to even dispute it.

I am quite familiar with Frankel's last race. Maintaining an understanding of how races are run is essential. Turf routes, especially over demanding ground like what they routinely traverse in Europe are rarely won by horses who make decisive moves over a half-mile out. Have you watched Frankel's race at Newmarket? How you could watch that and think there's even a chance in hell that "Uncle Mo could run Frankel into submission" is baffling.

I've never called Frankel one of the best...of anything. He is simply a VERY good horse who has passed every test with flying colors. It's obvious that he's developing steadily and has a turn of foot that makes him very tough to beat when he has a tactical advantage. Comparing him to a dirt horse who is currently laid up, was a horrible 3rd in his only graded stakes try of 2011, and is trying to regain 2YO form is silly.

You know what's funny and few are bringing it up. Overdriven's first two starts have been just as good if not better than Uncle Mo's and he has faced MUCH better horses.

[Indian Charlie]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

You are admittedly someone who doesn't wager on racing anymore and whose opinions are based primarily on progeny of Indian Charlie, Indian Charlie himself and your friend who owns Lubash. Your thinking is so one-dimensional when it comes to any of those topics that it's futile to even dispute it.

Your first part of the first sentence in this post is the only accurate statement you make.

While certainly a huge fan of IC, and that I do root for his progeny, your assessment of my opinions is a gross exaggeration. I'd like you to name one offspring of his in which I gushed unrealistically about his/her abilities. I'm probably the only person on this board that thought Indian Blessing was a tad bit overrated, in fact.

What does Lubash have to do with anything? You think because I want my friends horse to do well, I think he's some kind of superstar? Try to make some sense here Nick.

As to not betting and my opinions, my opinions were good enough to finish second through fifth a number of times in the TVG fantasy contest (always losing to DrugS however, which I see no shame in). Had the trainer of The Usual QT not switched plans at the last second, I probably would have won the 10k first prize in that other online fantasy contest, and since I didn't use a single offspring of IC, I'm going to boldly say you are full of shid.

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

I am quite familiar with Frankel's last race. Maintaining an understanding of how races are run is essential.

In your case, maintaining an understanding would be impossible, since you'd need an understanding in the first place.

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

Turf routes, especially over demanding ground like what they routinely traverse in Europe are rarely won by horses who make decisive moves over a half-mile out. Have you watched Frankel's race at Newmarket? How you could watch that and think there's even a chance in hell that "Uncle Mo could run Frankel into submission" is baffling.

Yeah, I watched. What's baffling to me is you thinking he's so much more a superior runner than Mo was. Honestly, how do you picture a race in which Frankel 'destroys' Mo? Mo is at least as fast, and certainly has less questions regarding stamina.

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

I've never called Frankel one of the best...of anything. He is simply a VERY good horse who has passed every test with flying colors. It's obvious that he's developing steadily and has a turn of foot that makes him very tough to beat when he has a tactical advantage. Comparing him to a dirt horse who is currently laid up, was a horrible 3rd in his only graded stakes try of 2011, and is trying to regain 2YO form is silly.

I take it back, this last bit is accurate as well. I never did say you called Frankel one of the best ever, but MANY people have, and that's what I was addressing in the first place. Like you, I see him as a VERY good horse that might be potentially great. His turn of foot is awesome, and so far, when he has every possible tactical advantage, he crushes his opposition. When he hasn't had everything go exactly his way, however, he's been less than spectacular.

As for my comparison to Mo, I did acknowledge Mo has his issues, thus, my comparison to Mo was not entirely relevant or useful. I did bring up other horses as well.

My point with Mo was simply to say that purely on the basis of ability, there are horses in this crop of 3yos that I think would have handled him. Let alone horses of the last century.

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

You know what's funny and few are bringing it up. Overdriven's first two starts have been just as good if not better than Uncle Mo's and he has faced MUCH better horses.

You think the Sanford was as impressive as the Champagne? I'm not sure what to make of that.

As for their respective debuts, I'll stick with Mo's as well.

And we'll see how that Henny Hughes that came back to win, we'll see how long he stays around.

[Indian Charlie]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

Even the most unabashed Uncle Mo fan should be realistic enough to know that Frankel would destroy him.

And by the way, I may be a fan of Uncle Mo, but I'm pretty realistic about his abilities. Do I think he is (or was) far superior to the rest of this crop? Yes. Do I think he's the best 2-3 year old of the last xx years? No.

Frankel as one of the top three milers of the last century? Now that what I call unrealistic. If he were to hook some of the faster milers in recent history (by faster I mean high quality milers with great early speed), he'd be toast.