Valiant loss puts Zenyatta's prowess in perspective

[Smooth Operator]

...Zenyatta's fans can make a reasonable claim that she should be considered the greatest U.S. filly or mare of all time.


Cannon may just fire bomb Andy's house after that one


So ends a truly great career for the most talented older race mare I have ever seen. -- SD


Think he already has a contract out on Davidowitz' life … lol


http://www.gradeoneracing.com/davidowitz.htm?read=74

[Dahoss]

lol

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Smooth Operator

...Zenyatta's fans can make a reasonable claim that she should be considered the greatest U.S. filly or mare of all time.


Cannon may just fire bomb Andy's house after that one


So ends a truly great career for the most talented older race mare I have ever seen. -- SD


Think he already has a contract out on Davidowitz' life … lol


http://www.gradeoneracing.com/davidowitz.htm?read=74

I think she is a very good horse. In a year everyone will have forgotten about her and moved on to the next horse of the century.

SD obviously missed the Mile

[10 pnt move up]

It amazes me the comparison of a 6 year old mare losing to a 4 year old colt as the defining race determining her talent and ability.

Its an unprovable opinion but I really think she was at her best as a 4 year old and had this race been run two years ago I am not sure she comes up a head short.

[randallscott35]

She's a useful mare. That win parlay is now zero on her.

[CSC]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

I think she is a very good horse. In a year everyone will have forgotten about her and moved on to the next horse of the century.

SD obviously missed the Mile

Do you have an opinion why turf fillies/mares fare better against the males? We've seen it in Japan, France, England, here in the BC, however there are not too many dirt females that have any tangible success against male dirt horses. On the surface it would seem turf is a whole different ballgame that allows both sexes to compete on a level playing field, I'm not knocking anyone, I'm just pointing out when a female beats males on turf, I hardly bat an eye anymore.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by CSC

Do you have an opinion why turf fillies/mares fare better against the males? We've seen it in Japan, France, England, here in the BC, however there are not too many dirt females that have any tangible success against male dirt horses. On the surface it would seem turf is a whole different ballgame that allows both sexes to compete on a level playing field, I'm not knocking anyone, I'm just pointing out when a female beats males on turf, I hardly bat an eye anymore.

I don't know that it would be the case if it was tried more often here. The older horses the past decade with a few notable exceptions have been pretty awful. RA last year was simply better than the 3 yo colts and Z was probably better than the colts this year. You would have hoped that Zenyatta would have taken more chances against colts. Perhaps after her presumed success and the success of RA that more people would try to beat them with really good fillies. Of course if they vote Zenyatta horse of the year after cupcake city and a loss then that would pretty much give the connections of the next great filly precedent to not try to compete with the best horses.

[CSC]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

I don't know that it would be the case if it was tried more often here. The older horses the past decade with a few notable exceptions have been pretty awful. RA last year was simply better than the 3 yo colts and Z was probably better than the colts this year. You would have hoped that Zenyatta would have taken more chances against colts. Perhaps after her presumed success and the success of RA that more people would try to beat them with really good fillies. Of course if they vote Zenyatta horse of the year after cupcake city and a loss then that would pretty much give the connections of the next great filly precedent to not try to compete with the best horses.

I'm sure it is tried more often, but I really think grass racing is the equalizer, all these great fillies have one thing in common, turn of foot. I was just thinking, there are not too many fillies that have dominated males, infact I can't think of one, on dirt anyway.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by CSC

I'm sure it is tried more often, but I really think grass racing is the equalizer, all these great fillies have one thing in common, turn of foot. I was just thinking, there are not too many fillies that have dominated males, infact I can't think of one, on dirt anyway.

There have been very few American turf mares to beat boys lately on the grass than there has been dirt mares. The fact that the connections of top horses seem to have an aversion to competition won't help. I would have loved to see Zenyatta on the grass (real grass I mean). Hard to believe she wouldnt have been one of the few american horses of the last 30 or so years that may have been good enough with enough stamina to have a shot in the Melbourne Cup

[CSC]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

There have been very few American turf mares to beat boys lately on the grass than there has been dirt mares. The fact that the connections of top horses seem to have an aversion to competition won't help. I would have loved to see Zenyatta on the grass (real grass I mean). Hard to believe she wouldnt have been one of the few american horses of the last 30 or so years that may have been good enough with enough stamina to have a shot in the Melbourne Cup

Officially she isn't retired yet, now the Matriarch was shortened to 8 furlongs so that is out, Japan Cup? I would love to see it, but we know this isn't happening.

[Indian Charlie]

Originally Posted by CSC

Do you have an opinion why turf fillies/mares fare better against the males? We've seen it in Japan, France, England, here in the BC, however there are not too many dirt females that have any tangible success against male dirt horses. On the surface it would seem turf is a whole different ballgame that allows both sexes to compete on a level playing field, I'm not knocking anyone, I'm just pointing out when a female beats males on turf, I hardly bat an eye anymore.

It helps that they try to do it on turf.

However, there are plenty of examples in the last few years of fillies/mares beating males on dirt.

[CSC]

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie

It helps that they try to do it on turf.

However, there are plenty of examples in the last few years of fillies/mares beating males on dirt.

Yeah I know there have been a few, however I mean't races only at the highest level. Certainly not as frequent as in Europe. Someone mentioned Jolypha, her BC Classic is one of the best performances by a filly on dirt that is often overlooked. But that was still only a 3rd.

[King Glorious]

Originally Posted by CSC

Do you have an opinion why turf fillies/mares fare better against the males? We've seen it in Japan, France, England, here in the BC, however there are not too many dirt females that have any tangible success against male dirt horses. On the surface it would seem turf is a whole different ballgame that allows both sexes to compete on a level playing field, I'm not knocking anyone, I'm just pointing out when a female beats males on turf, I hardly bat an eye anymore.

It's all about opportunity and need. In other parts of the world, there has always been a huge disparity between the purses of male and female races so once a female showed she was good enough to try it, it made sense to run her against the boys because the purses just weren't worth it in female races. Over the years as female purses have improved, the mentality has stayed the same. They understand what Americans don't seem to and that is that if given the chance, girls can compete. Here, while the purses aren't equal, they are big enough for the girls to keep them in their own division. You'll get the occassional attempt but then it's usually followed by a return to their own sex. If Zenyatta were trained anywhere else, once she won the Classic, she would have basically stayed in open competition. As others have said, I agree that the reason you haven't seen it more is because of lack of opportunity and not because of a lack of ability.

Just as an aside, after the race I was even more pissed at Zenyatta's connections than before. I really feel cheated because they deprived us of seeing some really great things. She could have run away and hid in the SA Hcp, Hollywood Gold Cup, and Pacific Classic. She could have come east and done some things. Instead, they stayed ultra conservative. I think that had they won some of those other big races, they'd have built up some credits and could withstand a loss in the Classic, sort of like Curlin in 2008 and Cigar in 1996. But by playing it the way they did, they left themselves no room for error and even though many walked away thinking Zenyatta ran the better race, she still lost and that should end any arguments for her to be HOY. To me, it's either Blame or Goldikova.

[Port Conway Lane]

Personally she is the best stretch running filly/mare I have seen since Relaxing. Personal Ensign deserves acknowledgement as well.

Zenyatta's career was truly remarkable and until yesterday it was difficult for me to assess her because of the surface/competition issues.

At the very least we finally got to see her best.