Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Sports Bar & Grill
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-21-2010, 09:28 PM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani View Post
If they are serious about trading Ben for a top ten pick, it would be in essence dumping him. I think its more smoke than anything else but I applaud the Steelers for their stance.

A two time super bowl winning QB that is in his prime and is arguably top five in the game (arguably) for one draft pick?
Why trade for a guy who will be out 6 games?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-21-2010, 09:40 PM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com...en-problem/?hp
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-21-2010, 09:43 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randallscott35 View Post
Why trade for a guy who will be out 6 games?
Well, it might just be 4 games. That aside, look at what you are getting in terms of talent. Look at his age. Look at his contract.

He will make 8.05 million in 2010. He will make a little over 11 million from 2011-2014 and will make a little over 12 million in 2015. Where are you going to find a two time super bowl winning QB in his twenties and be able to not only get away with a reasonable yearly salary but also not have to pay a giant signing bonus?

Regardless of how much of a creep i think he is, there is no doubt he can play. Taking away Manning, Brady and Brees, Ben is in the conversation with any other QB in the league and you can still build a team around him.

If you are the Bills or Browns, you wouldn't take him over what else is out there?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-21-2010, 09:44 PM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani View Post
Well, it might just be 4 games. That aside, look at what you are getting in terms of talent. Look at his age. Look at his contract.

He will make 8.05 million in 2010. He will make a little over 11 million from 2011-2014 and will make a little over 12 million in 2015. Where are you going to find a two time super bowl winning QB in his twenties and be able to not only get away with a reasonable yearly salary but also not have to pay a giant signing bonus?

Regardless of how much of a creep i think he is, there is no doubt he can play. Taking away Manning, Brady and Brees, Ben is in the conversation with any other QB in the league and you can still build a team around him.

If you are the Bills or Browns, you wouldn't take him over what else is out there?
Baggage. No.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-21-2010, 09:47 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randallscott35 View Post
Baggage. No.
Well, thats another story. Regardless of how I feel about him, I would take a chance on him if I were a GM in the top ten. He is still young and still has a chance to redeem himself and become a better person.

I think you have a greater risk of Casey Clausen or Sam Bradford ending up being a bum.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-21-2010, 09:49 PM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani View Post
Well, thats another story. Regardless of how I feel about him, I would take a chance on him if I were a GM in the top ten. He is still young and still has a chance to redeem himself and become a better person.

I think you have a greater risk of Casey Clausen or Sam Bradford ending up being a bum.
Maybe.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-22-2010, 06:05 AM
Hickory Hill Hoff's Avatar
Hickory Hill Hoff Hickory Hill Hoff is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: the "Sand Flats"
Posts: 6,903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani View Post
Well, thats another story. Regardless of how I feel about him, I would take a chance on him if I were a GM in the top ten. He is still young and still has a chance to redeem himself and become a better person.

I think you have a greater risk of Casey Clausen or Sam Bradford ending up being a bum.
I agree
__________________
"Change can be good, but constant change shows no direction"

http://www.hickoryhillhoff.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-21-2010, 09:46 PM
Nascar1966 Nascar1966 is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randallscott35 View Post
Why trade for a guy who will be out 6 games?
You have just brought an excellent point. Im thinking if someone trades for him they will more likely make him a fix to a bad quarterback situation. Im sure there might at least four or five teams who need help at quarterback and might be willing to trade for a quarterback who has proven that he knows how to win games. I am well aware there are a few talented quarterbacks in this years draft. Is a team willing to get an unproven quarterback when there is a proven quarterback available? Again I think its disgraceful what Roethlisberger has done. Im sure some teams are willing to take a chance on him. How many chances did Pacman Jones get?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-21-2010, 09:47 PM
Rudeboyelvis Rudeboyelvis is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randallscott35 View Post
Why trade for a guy who will be out 6 games?
I can name 6 teams easily, and probably another 10 with some thought... Amazing they wait until 2 days before the draft to announce it - they must have a stake in boosting the draft day ratings
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-21-2010, 09:49 PM
Rudeboyelvis Rudeboyelvis is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,440
Default

By the way, the Redskins are now officially kicking themselves in the asz.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-21-2010, 09:53 PM
Nascar1966 Nascar1966 is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis View Post
By the way, the Redskins are now officially kicking themselves in the asz.
Throwing money around still hasn't bought Daniel Snyder a Super Bowl win let a Conference Championship. At least George Steinbrenner has some World Series wins.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-21-2010, 09:57 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nascar1966 View Post
Throwing money around still hasn't bought Daniel Snyder a Super Bowl win let a Conference Championship. At least George Steinbrenner has some World Series wins.
Yeah, but, George didnt have to deal with a salary cap and revenue sharing either. On top of that, George went almost twenty years between titles and 15 years between playoff appearances while having the highest payroll in the league for much of that time.

Snyder will figure it out. Bringing in Shanahan was a good step.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-21-2010, 11:13 PM
Nascar1966 Nascar1966 is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani View Post
Yeah, but, George didnt have to deal with a salary cap and revenue sharing either. On top of that, George went almost twenty years between titles and 15 years between playoff appearances while having the highest payroll in the league for much of that time.

Snyder will figure it out. Bringing in Shanahan was a good step.
I agree with you about Shanahan. He will be a tremendous asset for the Skins.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-22-2010, 04:47 AM
Bigsmc's Avatar
Bigsmc Bigsmc is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,577
Default

4 concussions in 6 years (that we know of). He's a mental and physical time bomb. I'm also in the Phil Camp and have always thought of him as just good.

I'd pass.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-21-2010, 10:00 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis View Post
By the way, the Redskins are now officially kicking themselves in the asz.
Ben would have gotten it worse behind that skins line than he would have in a jailhouse shower.

Still...a mere first round draft pick for roethlisberger? yeah, they are kicking themselves.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-21-2010, 10:05 PM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani View Post
Ben would have gotten it worse behind that skins line than he would have in a jailhouse shower.

Still...a mere first round draft pick for roethlisberger? yeah, they are kicking themselves.
Given what they paid for a guy equally or more talented than Rothlisberger... they aren't kicking themselves at all.

I honestly have never thought Big Ben was anything more than just good though.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-21-2010, 10:19 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philcski View Post
Given what they paid for a guy equally or more talented than Rothlisberger... they aren't kicking themselves at all.

I honestly have never thought Big Ben was anything more than just good though.
I like Mcnabb. I always have. But he is getting old and he has taken a lot of hits. He is certainly on the downside of his career.

Benro is in the midst of his prime and he has two skins on the wall.

You can't build around Mcnabb anymore. The window is small. With Roethlisberger, you have plenty of time to grow as a team.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-21-2010, 10:22 PM
Rudeboyelvis Rudeboyelvis is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philcski View Post
Given what they paid for a guy equally or more talented than Rothlisberger... they aren't kicking themselves at all.

I honestly have never thought Big Ben was anything more than just good though.
I'd have to disagree - though last year was a precursor to things to come - now minus Santonio Holmes.
The guy got it done with a suspect line (now exposed) no running game and a decent receiver corps... D kept them in contention ( and you saw what impact the absence of Palamolu had) last season...There is not much left there since the SB.... he'd welcome a change I'm sure.

He is more of a natural fit to the existing Redskins scheme than McNabb is, though as a lifelong Skins guy, I'm not complaining either way
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-21-2010, 10:27 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis View Post
I'd have to disagree - though last year was a precursor to things to come - now minus Santonio Holmes.
The guy got it done with a suspect line (now exposed) no running game and a decent receiver corps... D kept them in contention ( and you saw what impact the absence of Palamolu had) last season...There is not much left there since the SB.... he'd welcome a change I'm sure.

He is more of a natural fit to the existing Redskins scheme than McNabb is, though as a lifelong Skins guy, I'm not complaining either way
You mean you weren't excited to see another year of Jason Campbell taking an hour to run the two minute drill?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-22-2010, 06:07 AM
Hickory Hill Hoff's Avatar
Hickory Hill Hoff Hickory Hill Hoff is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: the "Sand Flats"
Posts: 6,903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philcski View Post
Given what they paid for a guy equally or more talented than Rothlisberger... they aren't kicking themselves at all.

I honestly have never thought Big Ben was anything more than just good though.
He could help your BILLS though!
__________________
"Change can be good, but constant change shows no direction"

http://www.hickoryhillhoff.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.