4/3 (AQU): Carter, Wood (G1's); Bay Shore, Excelsior (G3's)

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

PG just declared him the TC winner in the Giants Causeway thread...



You KNOW what that means......

Chuckles, a while back... I mean a while back you told me a Giants Causeway would NEVER win a Grade 1 on dirt. Do you remember that? I mean Heatseeker already should have, but now today, today it happens.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

Chuckles, a while back... I mean a while back you told me a Giants Causeway would NEVER win a Grade 1 on dirt. Do you remember that? I mean Heatseeker already should have, but now today, today it happens.

Hey it only took what? 600, 700 foals?

[randallscott35]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Hey it only took what? 600, 700 foals?

Pg can't count, don't worry.

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by randallscott35

Pg can't count, don't worry.

Your really on a roll tonight man, keep up the front wrap bullshit, you did well with that.

[randallscott35]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

Your really on a roll tonight man, keep up the front wrap bullshit, you did well with that.

Save this post. The fact that you don't even pay attention to things like wraps is why you should be booking and not betting.

[NTamm1215]

Originally Posted by randallscott35

Save this post. The fact that you don't even pay attention to things like wraps is why you should be booking and not betting.

Did you skip the post where it was spelled out clearly why he had the wraps on?

NT

[Indian Charlie]

I dont know why Randall is taking such grief about the FW.

It was a valid question or observation at the time, when nobody knew why he was wearing them.

Unless I missed something, he wasn't proclaiming him a done horse.

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by randallscott35

Save this post. The fact that you don't even pay attention to things like wraps is why you should be booking and not betting.

The wraps were not an issue clearly, but you will keep arguing it like they were, because you cant admit your wrong. The horse wins by 10 in hand, and your talking about ****ing wraps. Never once was he asked to run, ever asked to run.

[randallscott35]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

The wraps were not an issue clearly, but you will keep arguing it like they were, because you cant admit your wrong. The horse wins by 10 in hand, and your talking about ****ing wraps. Never once was he asked to run, ever asked to run.

FYI, here's why you are dumb? B/c I posted about the wraps after the race, not before. The race was clearly impressive, I was speaking about the next already and you were in the past still.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

The wraps were not an issue clearly, but you will keep arguing it like they were, because you cant admit your wrong. The horse wins by 10 in hand, and your talking about ****ing wraps. Never once was he asked to run, ever asked to run.

Once again....adults are talking....so keep quiet.

The front wraps question is a legit one....and NTamm offered a reasonable reason for them.....and then backed it up with a quote from Pletcher. However, to deny that wondering about a horse, especially one like this one, wearing them for the first time is legitimate would be, well, as foolish as much of what you post.

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Hey it only took what? 600, 700 foals?

The point is, you said never......

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

The point is, you said never......

I was right for a pretty long time...


He still is a much better turf sire