![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
So what about other fairly recent attempts to administer medications or foreign substances into horses outside the prescribed times that took place in New York and Tampa and other tracks throughout the country. Are the feds or state agencies going to go look into those incidents for fraud? Horses working at a different track under an assumed name while being stabled at a racetrack in another completely different state prior to running in a stakes race...pretty much seems kind of the same as a clocker making up fake times.
How about the people caught redhanded milkshaking horses? Are indictments coming for them for committing fraud? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
@TimeformUSfigs |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Innocent until proven guilty folks this is Waterville Pa. not Antwerp
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
C'mon Fred...a little extra lasix and getting indicted, facing 50 years and a $500,000 fine? Why not go after the real cheaters to make a statement?
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
When did this story break? Cuz someone mentioned something about ongoing investigations in pa on another forum yesterday. Kinda ironic
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
feds got involved because of interstate crime. so, conceivably, any trainer busted at a track could face federal charges due to wagering being interstate commerce. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wells trained Rapid Redux to 22 in a row. McGwire would be proud.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The feds are arguing that the drugging or attempted drugging is an attempt to change the outcome of the race - as those races are transmitted via simulcast (wire) for consumption across state lines. I'm guessing a place like Rillito Park, which doesn't distribute their signal, is free and clear from this. My initial reaction to this, after reading the indictments, is that this could be just the first in a monumentally long line of "easy pickings." Whether/how it sticks is a different story, but it feels like this is just the start of a much MUCH bigger deal that is definitely not going to be limited to Penn National. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
In the clockers case if giving faulty information across "state lines" is considered wire fraud then what about all the mistimed races across the country? |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Has anyone NOT heard of horses being given incorrect times in works at some point at some track? The difference between Friday morning before this announcement and now is that it is being identified as a federal crime. Ponder that. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
I will believe that Pat when they take down one of the big boys from a major track. Not nobodies at Penn National.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'm just wondering what precedent these cases could cause. In the case of Webb and Rogers the Feds obviously are going to use their admissions against them and a legal question would be can your testimony in a hearing to a state commission be used against you? Could they start pulling case files from any trainer that has had a positive test and use that information against them and retroactively charge them? |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
For a crime doesnt there have to be evidence of willfully committing the crime? I dont think they arresting a simple mistake, which obviously this clocker did not.
__________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"...Voltaire |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Supposedly the Feds were tipped off about misdeeds at Penn natl right around the Gill issue. I doubt they really care much about racing or the track but an eager Federal prosecutor saw an easy way to pad his record. Busting semi-broke trainers who dont have lawyers on retainers on Federal fraud charges is like a walkover. |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
I somehow sense Chuck that you think this is a witch hunt. Surely this is about more than 2cc's of lasix...clean trainers have nothing to worry about.
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
typically an entity will try to find a really good case as a test case, to try to set precedent. i would have to think any trainer or any track personnel is taking a long, hard look at how they function, and whether changes should be made. does anyone really want the feds involved? probably not. but these subjects have been hashed out repeatedly, with no real changes made, because no one has had the power to change things. i have to think someone made this call to the feds to get this going, because no one else either had the ability or the wherewithall to make a profound change. and of course the case is cherry picked, chuck. that's how this stuff is done. they won't waste their time on a case that might not go their way. somebody has to be the poster child. |