![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() quote the bill, not what the shepherds have fed you. ACTUAL quotes from either document.
Assertions with no proof are dismissed. This is the part where you tell me to do my own homework to prove your point right?
__________________
don't run out of ammo. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() "Quote the part" ?? - yeah - the whole budget. The parts that are all over the news.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
don't run out of ammo. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I'm just shocked to see you admit you haven't the first clue about why the Wisconsin recalls occurred, and what happened to start them - the votes, the laws that were passed. You've heard of the Ryan Budget, right?
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
"66.0518 Defined benefit pension plans. A local governmental unit, as defined in s. 66.0131 (1) (a), may not establish a defined benefit pension plan for its employees unless the plan requires the employees to pay half of all actuarially required contributions for funding benefits under the plan and prohibits the local governmental unit from paying on behalf of an employee any of the employee’s share of the actuarially required contributions." -seems reasonable, no? search for wealthy...no matches found. search for income...all results are for State income or reference incomes levels relative to poverty levels and the benefits available to those folks. Unable to find any mention of cuts for the wealthy in there.
__________________
don't run out of ammo. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Think really hard about this concept of "somebody has to pay for the tax cuts". Go back to when the Wisconsin state senate passed the union busting bill. Read the newspapers around that time. Wisconsin was in a massive deficit. Who got the tax cuts? Who got income cut to pay for it? What was in Act 10?
You say that simply doesn't exist. Open your eyes. Pretending it doesn't exist unless you find one legal document that has actual language that says, "we will cut taxes for the rich by taking pension money" is laughably obtuse. The actuality is present in both the Walker's Wisconsin budget bill, and the Ryan budget.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Proof or dismissal. Your rules.
__________________
don't run out of ammo. |