A Case of Why WI Voters Should Show ID

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

Looks like the DNR even agrees with the Republicans. That is AMAZING!

It's a shame you find that "AMAZING". Most people are not black and white demagogues, hateful of the "other side", regarding government and politics. That, unfortunately, is a relatively new phenomena. Wisconsin will take years to recover from the political hate and intolerance which is coming, frankly, from a small minority of citizens and politicians.

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

It's a shame you find that "AMAZING". Most people are not black and white demagogues, hateful of the "other side", regarding government and politics. That, unfortunately, is a relatively new phenomena. Wisconsin will take years to recover from the political hate and intolerance which is coming, frankly, from a small minority of citizens and politicians.

You obviously have never dealt with the DNR in the state of WI. What is amazing is that someone at the DNR agrees with the bill. Doesn't that open your eyes at all?

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

You obviously have never dealt with the DNR in the state of WI. What is amazing is that someone at the DNR agrees with the bill. Doesn't that open your eyes at all?

It tells me that alot of people are political whor.es. No eye-opening there. It is what it is.

[Riot]

I don't have a link where you can donate. Post it when you get it.
--------------

As a result of the ongoing criminal investigation of his former aides and appointees, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) has set up a legal defense fund for the "John Doe" investigation of his time as Milwaukee county executive that has already ensnared several of his former staffers.

The "John Doe" investigation has already resulted in misdemeanor and felony charges against six of Walker's top aides. The probe by the Milwaukee County district attorney’s office is reportedly focusing on whether staffers who worked for Walker did political work with taxpayer money.

Walker is the first governor in Wisconsin history to establish a legal defense fund.

Walker is also raising money to defend himself against recall efforts. On Friday, the state Government Accountability Board recommended setting a gubernatorial recall primary date of May 15, with the general election on June 12. Kristen Crowell, executive director of the labor-affiliated group We Are Wisconsin, called the dates an "unnecessary delay."

From Walker's press release:

For nearly two years, Milwaukee County officials have been examining issues related to former employees of the County. I have repeatedly pledged my cooperation with that inquiry. I also made it clear that no public money has been used, or will be used, to pay for the attorneys needed to review documents and assist me in cooperating. To fulfill my commitment, I have today formed a legal fund to pay for the expenses incurred in cooperating with the inquiry. The fund will operate in accordance with the Wisconsin law authorizing these accounts, which was passed almost thirty years ago.”

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

It tells me that alot of people are political whor.es. No eye-opening there. It is what it is.

Still waiting for your link. I can find 50 + stories that agreed with my statement and not one that stated that the mining company left because of dropping ore prices before the vote. I guess you must have made that up in your own world.

[Riot]

Scott Walker now under investigation in John Doe investigation

On Friday Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) announced the formation of a legal defense fund as a result of a John Doe criminal investigation of activities that took place during his time as county executive.

Wisconsin law only permits the formation of a legal defense fund when an official “is being investigated for or charged with a violation of campaign finance laws or prohibited election practices.”

The creation of the fund is an admission, even passively, that the Walker administration just acknowledged it is under investigation.

Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/gov-scot...#ixzz1okQweYUq

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by wiphan

Still waiting for your link. I can find 50 + stories that agreed with my statement and not one that stated that the mining company left because of dropping ore prices before the vote. I guess you must have made that up in your own world.

that and pretty much all the other BS she comes up with.

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

that and pretty much all the other BS she comes up with.

What AMAZES me is that the proponents against voter ID spend all of their time arguing that the law disenfranchises voters. If they truly cared about this segment of people why wouldn't they spend their time or money trying to help this supposed large segment of the people actually obtain IDs. The argument against voter ID is probably the worst argument I have seen. Try helping this segment get photo IDs instead of fighting the law with your liberal judges. No one wants to take away a person's right to vote. What we do want is elections to be held fairly and honestly. If there is no fraud what are the democrats so afraid of.

[Danzig]

you have to have a form of i.d. to register to vote. so why is requiring an i.d. to actually cast a ballot an issue?
if it's ok to get it at registration, why is it not ok when election time actually gets here?
how is it an infringement at the polls, but not when registering?

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by wiphan

The argument against voter ID is probably the worst argument I have seen. .

the people who are against gay marraige because of their own personal religious beliefs... that's my top for terrible arguments!

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Riot

It's a shame you find that "AMAZING". Most people are not black and white demagogues, hateful of the "other side", regarding government and politics.

what's amazing is you, RIot, actually posted this. considering you are the poster child of hate when it comes to republicans.

biggest hypocrite on the internet? Riot for sure.