should have been vetoed! - Page 2

dellinger63 · #21 01-01-2012, 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot

You haven't got a clue what the Defense Act negotiations have been about either, do you?

Unlike you, I don't have two Arab graduate students to base my Arab world view on.

Riot · #22 01-01-2012, 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Unlike you, I don't have two Arab graduate students to base my Arab world view on.

As I said, you haven't got a clue what the Defense Act contains, what was removed, or what we are talking about, do you?

You, Cannon and Anti should sit in your armchairs, get high, and throw insults at one another, as you all seem to think that's what discussing politics is about

dellinger63 · #23 01-01-2012, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot

As I said, you haven't got a clue what the Defense Act contains, what was removed, or what we are talking about, do you?

You, Cannon and Anti should sit in your armchairs, get high, and throw insults at one another, as you all seem to think that's what discussing politics is about

You really don't have a clue, about anything.

GPK · #24 01-01-2012, 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

No the subject is you inferred that US "agressiveness" was inciting "trouble" with Iran as though you are the Bagdad Bob of Iran.

Any relation to Exacta Bob of Pinckney?

Cannon Shell · #25 01-01-2012, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot

At least the President eliminated much of the warmongering aggressiveness and attempts to incite trouble with Iran put in by the GOP

Strawman? Lets face it you are a shill and generally unable to think an original thought.

Cannon Shell · #26 01-01-2012, 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK

Any relation to Exacta Bob of Pinckney?

2nd cousin

Riot · #27 01-01-2012, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Strawman? Lets face it you are a shill and generally unable to think an original thought.

Fail. Yes, I know you don't like me. Old news. Try again. Try learning what the GOP tried to place into the bill regarding international banking options and sanctions against Iran, what made it through, what was removed, what Iran's response was, and get back to me. That is, if you want to talk politics. If you just want to sit in a circle-jerk with Dell and call me names, have at it, but thanks, I'll pass.

Cannon Shell · #28 01-01-2012, 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot

Fail. Try again. Try learning what the GOP tried to place into the bill regarding international banking options and sanctions against Iran, what made it through, what was removed, what Iran's response was, and get back to me.

Try getting a clue. Are we now supposed to back down from Iran when they dont like what we do or say? The biggest pitfalls to economic sanctions is damage to countries that we are supposedly allies of, not because Iran doesnt like it.

Riot · #29 01-01-2012, 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Try getting a clue. Are we now supposed to back down from Iran when they dont like what we do or say? The biggest pitfalls to economic sanctions is damage to countries that we are supposedly allies of, not because Iran doesnt like it.

Sigh ... here. Have some matches for your straw men.

If you want to talk about the contents that didn't make it into the Defense Bill, and how Iran responded to them, get back to me.

Cannon Shell · #30 01-01-2012, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot

Fail. Yes, I know you don't like me. Old news. Try again. Try learning what the GOP tried to place into the bill regarding international banking options and sanctions against Iran, what made it through, what was removed, what Iran's response was, and get back to me. That is, if you want to talk politics. If you just want to sit in a circle-jerk with Dell and call me names, have at it, but thanks, I'll pass.

There are a lot of people that I "like" that also havent seen the ball since kickoff. Your take on most things is directly out of the comments section on news articles from Daily Kos. How could anyone self respecting citizen not take umbrage with your inane takes on news items. It isnt that I dislike you at all just bristle at your intellectual superiority complex which rears its ugly head in almost any thread where you are challenged.

Now I am going to go get the rest of my moneys worth out of the redzone channel as the only reason I even ventured to DT this afternoon was hoping to see some suffering Jets fans comments in the sports section.

Riot · #31 01-01-2012, 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

There are a lot of people that I "like" that also havent seen the all since kickoff. You take on most things is directly out of the comments section on news articles from Daily Kos. How could anyone self respecting citizen not take umbrage with your inane takes on news items. It isnt that I dislike you at all just bristle at your intellectual superiority complex which rears its ugly head in almost any thread where you are challenged.

Circle jerk it is, then! Have fun with that.

I said: "At least the President eliminated much of the warmongering aggressiveness and attempts to incite trouble with Iran put in by the GOP."

That incited your typical name calling crap. If you had any real knowledge of the subject, you would list those eliminated provisions, and tell me why I am wrong to label them warmongering aggressiveness. But you can't, because that's not why you post. You don't have a clue about what those provisions are, and you don't care.

You are what you are, and every time you post you remind me why I quit working for you.

dellinger63 · #32 01-01-2012, 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot

Circle jerk it is, then! Have fun with that..

In a nutshell stop wanting/coveting what you don't/can't have.

Occupy a Circle Jerk should be your new mantra

Riot · #33 01-01-2012, 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63

In a nutshell stop wanting/coveting what you don't/can't have.

Occupy a Circle Jerk should be your new mantra

Have another beer.

Riot · #34 01-01-2012, 03:49 PM

So here's the post I made before the thread was interrupted. If any of you political brainiacs actually want to talk about the Defense Act, the good and bad in it, step up.

Quote:

The time to get upset about this stuff is in the months prior to the signing, while Congress is adding their horrible little nasties to it. Not after it's all done.

At least the President eliminated much of the warmongering aggressiveness and attempts to incite trouble with Iran put in by the GOP (reference the Iran financial sanctions) Nice to see you guys give him credit for that. Oh, wait ... you aren't.

Not to mention the following:

Quote:

Among the changes the administration secured was striking a provision that would have eliminated executive branch authority to use civilian courts for trying terrorism cases against foreign nationals.

The administration also pushed Congress to change a provision that would have denied U.S. citizens suspected of terrorism the right to trial and could have subjected them to indefinite detention. Lawmakers eventually dropped the military custody requirement for U.S. citizens or lawful U.S. residents.

The President eliminated the indefinite military detention and denial of right to trial the GOP placed up you and your fellow citizens. You're welcome.