Solargate

[clyde]

Originally Posted by Riot

Your first post on this thread was not about the subject of this thread, but was a reference making fun of me regarding a subject on another thread.

You followed that up with your second post, calling me a hypocrite for something I've never said on these boards, and don't think (and an entirely different subject, again, than the subject of this thread)

And you refused to take back your name-calling when I pointed out your name-calling was not only unsupported by fact, but false based upon what I think.

Tell me about irony and hypocrisy, Dell. Lecture me about it. When you joined this thread with two posts that were only about about bashing me, with the second post also lying about my political opinion and falsely calling me a hypocrite.

Guess what? That makes you a jackass, Dell. Now please, make me laugh by going off on how hypocritical and how evil I am to call you a name.

eauxh!!






You muff puffer, you!!

[Rileyoriley]

Originally Posted by clyde

eauxh!!






You muff puffer, you!!

Welcome to the "Jackass" club.

[clyde]

kissykissykissykissy

[lord007]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...=all#pagebreak

[geeker2]

and the beat goes on...

http://www.businessinsider.com/solar...ra-loan-2011-9


and on.....what a business plan!


http://www.businessinsider.com/gover...isaster-2011-9

[dellinger63]

Days before a solar panel maker collapsed, the Obama administration considered a bailout that would have provided an infusion of cash and a new board of directors, including two directors appointed by the Energy Department.

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/o...1/03/id/416668

So the social security administration can't be privatized because Americans will 'risk' their retirement savings in the stock market yet the idiots in charge make 'investments' like this? And to think some want 'them' involved in healthcare.

LOL Tax the 1% !!!

[Danzig]

i can't help but wonder if....

the feds decided to just take all the money they've spent on all these now failed programs, and put it all towards beefing up ss payments-would more retirement age people have retired or could retire, thereby forcing firms to hire, reducing unemployment, etc, etc...and actually having something useful come from all the spending?
perhaps instead of pushing to give money to states to hire teachers (money lasts one whole year), put it where it will make a real change.

and for crying out loud, states who allow public employees to 'retire' and then rehire them a month later, stop doing that! how does that put one unemployed person into a job?? it doesn't!