![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
That makes a difference. Breeders Cup is one (or two) days. $100 win on a 2-1 would appear to be a waste of 1% if the contest ended after $10,000 is wagered. I would shoot for at least a 10-1 return, two $50 exactas or DD's.
However if the money is used until it runs out or the meet ends I see nothing wrong with $100 win bet on a 2-1 that could be used for future opportunities. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Two chicks at the same time.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sorry about that man. I didn't check the link 'til afterward.
Clearly though, mediocre minds think alike. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
When Hoss posts a YouTube link, just assume it's something from Office Space.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't know about some of you, but a clearly defined target seems to me as the best way to apply almost any bankroll.
If I had the 10K - I'd be trying to make 50K. Now maybe this is unrealistic when looking at it from a strict handicapping ROI, but I usually try to make a G from the $200 I bring out. |