What would you do with a $10,000 SPA bankroll?

[PatCummings]

Originally Posted by Port Conway Lane

How does this work? Does the money invested churn until the end of the meet? If not then I see your point.

Honestly, I don't know.

[Port Conway Lane]

Originally Posted by PatCummings

Honestly, I don't know.

That makes a difference. Breeders Cup is one (or two) days. $100 win on a 2-1 would appear to be a waste of 1% if the contest ended after $10,000 is wagered. I would shoot for at least a 10-1 return, two $50 exactas or DD's.

However if the money is used until it runs out or the meet ends I see nothing wrong with $100 win bet on a 2-1 that could be used for future opportunities.

[cakes44]

Two chicks at the same time.

[pointman]

Originally Posted by cakes44

Two chicks at the same time.

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by cakes44

Two chicks at the same time.

[cakes44]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

Sorry about that man. I didn't check the link 'til afterward.

Clearly though, mediocre minds think alike.

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by cakes44

Sorry about that man. I didn't check the link 'til afterward.

Clearly though, mediocre minds think alike.

When Hoss posts a YouTube link, just assume it's something from Office Space.

[odbaxter]

I don't know about some of you, but a clearly defined target seems to me as the best way to apply almost any bankroll.
If I had the 10K - I'd be trying to make 50K. Now maybe this is unrealistic when looking at it from a strict handicapping ROI, but I usually try to make a G from the $200 I bring out.

[Linny]

Originally Posted by PatCummings

Honestly, I don't know.

The bankroll churns. It's paid out at the end.

Dick is also very mindful of the takeout and unless there is a c/o, he's not likely to shoot for the P6 and will play the P4's a bit but only when he thinks that he's finding value in one leg.

Knowing Dick and his handicapping and betting I do know that he is playing this bankroll as he does his own. He's also more inclined to take a slower and more cautious approach early on but more likely to pick up the pace once the meet gets underway and track trends etc are more apparent.

Dick is also less likely than Wiz to chant the Torah on live TV.

[Hickory Hill Hoff]

Originally Posted by Linny

The bankroll churns. It's paid out at the end.

Dick is also very mindful of the takeout and unless there is a c/o, he's not likely to shoot for the P6 and will play the P4's a bit but only when he thinks that he's finding value in one leg.

Knowing Dick and his handicapping and betting I do know that he is playing this bankroll as he does his own. He's also more inclined to take a slower and more cautious approach early on but more likely to pick up the pace once the meet gets underway and track trends etc are more apparent.

Dick is also less likely than Wiz to chant the Torah on live TV.

[2MinsToPost]

Simple math and risk vs reward