Wait On That Abortion

[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by Riot

Roe is based upon a woman's right to privacy under the Constitution. I agree with Roe, in that a woman's right to an abortion decreases as fetal viability outside the womb is enabled.

Yes, I think in a general way a woman's right to control her own body in all ways superceedes the rights of her unborn child, up to a certain extent, which must encompass a fetus that is viable outside the womb by definition - but it is clearly not black and white after a certain point (greatly determined by fetal viability as an independent organism) and must be assessed on an individual basis.

Not to be picky but aren't you saying that your view puts you in the position of judging which people will live and die, granting less rights to one life than another?

[Riot]

Originally Posted by somerfrost

Not to be picky but aren't you saying that your view puts you in the position of judging which people will live and die, granting less rights to one life than another?

See my explaination within my answer. I hardly think my answer can be put into "one view" status.

Not that animals have anything remotely to do with humans, of course, but I will readily spay dogs and cats within 3-4 weeks of their being bred and suspected to be probably pregnant, and I adamantly refuse to spay animals within 4 weeks of their due date. I do not find that position medically ethically or logically incompatible in the least.

[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by Riot

See my explaination within my answer. I hardly think my answer can be put into "one view" status.

Not that animals have anything remotely to do with humans, of course, but I will readily spay dogs and cats within 3-4 weeks of their being bred and suspected to be probably pregnant, and I adamantly refuse to spay animals within 4 weeks of their due date. I do not find that position medically ethically or logically incompatible in the least.

Well, this is an individual thing of course but witches believe that animals, like humans, have souls...so to me, I see little difference. Your logic doesn't apply to my beliefs, same with you ethical conclusion. Perhaps that's why I see this as an "either/or" situation.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by somerfrost

Well, this is an individual thing of course but witches believe that animals, like humans, have souls...so to me, I see little difference. Your logic doesn't apply to my beliefs, same with you ethical conclusion. Perhaps that's why I see this as an "either/or" situation.

I think animals have souls, too. And that has everything to do with the ethical decisions I make for my patients, and why I advocate for the patient to or over the owner. So your either/or logic doesn't apply to my real world of having to actually make and carry out those sorts of decisions on real souls sitting in front of me.

[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by Riot

I think animals have souls, too. And that has everything to do with the ethical decisions I make for my patients, and why I advocate for the patient to or over the owner. So your either/or logic doesn't apply to my real world of having to actually make and carry out those sorts of decisions on real souls sitting in front of me.

Years of working in nursing homes dealing with end of life decisions is part of the real world too. I still relegate the issue to either/or as it kept me sane (at least I think it did). We all deal with our reality in different ways.