Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahoss
You shouldn't have edited. The first version was a lot less paranoid and crazy.
|
I'm not crazy. I'm not paranoid. It's not like he n' myself communicate with each other often. If I was paranoid, I'd be on here writing him all the time. Like it, or not, he is the manipulative individual. How many times do I come comment about something he's said? No, folks, he comes to comment about me. It's always characterized the other way. Look at the front of this thread. He attacks. Look at the thread from last year that we're referring to. He comes in to comment about what I said. Your types, then come in calling me a nut. This is all repetitive. I see it. You guys do it over n' over again. People are just not aware enough to notice manipulative people. It takes saying how a trick is done, and that's boring to people. However, they aren't bored by the actual trick itself. My point (last year) about Caracortado, was that he was a real competitive horse. He immediately switched that to whether or not Caracortado was gunna win the Derby. That's something general switched to something very specific. He , then tied it to a horse from 2008 that I also never said was going to win the Derby. This is the same damn trick. See what I mean about repeating the same trick? Now, in 2011, when Caracortado has proven himself to be a very competitive horse, he switches it to what? The 2010 Kentucky Derby. Did I say he was gunna win that? No, never. He centered the discussion on that, because it's very hard to win. It's what he does. This individual is highly manipulative. On here, he has always been that way.
02-09-2011, 01:57 AM
Hybrid Mode
