Blind Luck

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

Anyone else want to talk some more shyt about me liking Caracortado?

Did he win the Derby?

You're hilarious. I picked Mine That Bird in the Borderland Derby. Should I have been doing victory laps after he rebounded with a win in the KY Derby?

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

Did he win the Derby?

You're hilarious. I picked Mine That Bird in the Borderland Derby. Should I have been doing victory laps after he rebounded with a win in the KY Derby?

I never said he'd win the Derby. I said he was worth 50-1 to win the Derby, and you said he's so bad that Chocolate Candy would beat him. You said he was my Derby choice. No matter how you manipulate it, he's now shown you he is better than you thought he was, and that I was correct for loving this horse's desire. Yes, Blind Luck n' Caracortado were the two three year olds I took a liking to last year. They showed me the most desire. They have turned out o.k. I am not ashamed of liking them.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

I never said he'd win the Derby. I said he was worth 50-1 to win the Derby, and you said he's so bad that Chocolate Candy would beat him. You said he was my Derby choice. No matter how you manipulate it, he's now shown you he is better than you thought he was, and that I was correct for loving this horse's desire. Yes, Blind Luck n' Caracortado were the two three year olds I took a liking to last year. They showed me the most desire. They have turned out o.k. I am not ashamed of liking them.

Actually no matter how you manipulate it you were wrong.

This exercise of yours is even embarrassing for the internet. But, please, feel free to carry on.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Meanwhile, Caracortado has shut you up. Don't worry, he's small, tries very hard, and may wear down again. Then, you can again tell us he's bad. Problem is that your boy (Beyer) has already given him a 102.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVnoPJfft_s

That's the video that should end this discussion.

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

Meanwhile, Caracortado has shut you up. Don't worry, he's small, tries very hard, and may wear down again. Then, you can again tell us he's bad. Problem is that your boy (Beyer) has already given him a 102.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVnoPJfft_s

That's the video that should end this discussion.

Is this your comment on youtube?

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or More Info. close
94 views Like Add toShareEmbed
Short URL Email orkut Myspace Blogger hi5 Live Spaces StumbleUpon tumblr. Bebo Loading... This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Sign In or Sign Up now!

HorseRacingize | February 01, 2011 | 4 likes, 0 dislikes
Caracortado Shows His Turf Chops in Millions Caracortado, a grade II winner...
HorseRacingize | February 01, 2011 | 4 likes, 0 dislikes
Caracortado Shows His Turf Chops in Millions


Caracortado, a grade II winner on Santa Anita's synthetic

Santa Anita's synthetic track last winter, proved equally at home on the lawn when he outlasted The Usual Q. T. to capture the $300,000 Sunshine Millions Turf by a half-length Jan. 29 (VIDEO).

This was the turf stakes debut for Caracortado, who was bred in California by Michael Machowsky who also trains the gelding and owns him as part of Lo Hi Racing with Donald Blahut's Blahut Racing. The 4-year-old son of Cat Dream won an optional claiming allowance at Hollywood Park in his only prior try on grass Nov. 11.

Joe Talamo drove Caracortado to victory at 3-1 odds with a stalking trip on the outside. Coming three wide around the far turn, Caracortado reached even terms with the Usual Q. T. leaving the eighth pole and gained a narrow advantage in deep stretch.

"He's a freak on turf and has such a tremendous turn of foot," Talamo said. "He just explodes that last eighth."

Caracortado won under strong encouragement over a stubborn The Usual Q. T. The second choice in the field of eight, The Usual Q. T. fought back hard along the inside for Victor Espinoza all the way to the wire but could not outfinish a game Caracortado.

"The great thing about him is he's run on every surface so far," Machowsky said. "Right now, percentages would point to staying on the turf, but he's so versatile I'm just going to play out my options."

Asked about Caracortado's next start, Machowsky said, "Right now, March 5 will be the date; whether it's the Kilroe Mile (gr. IT on turf) or the Santa Anita Handicap (gr. I at 1 ¼ miles on the main track), we'll just wait and see how it all plays out. At the level he's at now, every race is going to be a tough, tough race, but I want to make it as easy as possible on him. He's a gelding and I want him racing with us a long time."

The winning time was 1:46.75 for the 1 1/8-mile distance on firm ground.

It was 1 3/4 lengths to the late-running Soul Candy and Garrett Gomez in third as Cal-breds swept the top three spots over their Florida rivals. They were followed by 7-5 favorite Jeranimo, pacesetter Presious Passion, Mobiized, No Inflation, and Pickapocket.

After veering out at the start, Presious Passion carved fractions of :23.59, :47.02, and 1:10.81 while building a five-length lead. But the multiple grade I-winning lifetime earner of more than $2.6 million was overpowered in upper stretch by The Usual Q. T., who was in the clear briefly.

Rags-to-riches Caracortado, after winning all four of his starts as a 2-year-old, was a popular contender on California's Triple Crown trail last year. He captured the Robert B. Lewis Stakes (gr. II) in February before finishing third in the San Felipe Stakes (gr. II) and fourth in the Santa Anita Derby (gr. I).

In his only Triple Crown appearance, he ran seventh in the Preakness (gr. I) before going to the sidelines for six months. He returned with his win on the Hollywood Park turf Nov. 11.

The victory in the Millions Turf was worth $165,000, which expanded Caracortado's overall earnings to $491,520. He has now won seven of 11 starts.

Caracortado is out of the Maria's Mon mare Mons Venus.

Sent off as the third choice, the winning chestnut carried 120 pounds and paid $8.20, $3.80, and $2.80 and topped a $27.20 exacta. The Usual Q. T., second to Jeranimo in the San Gabriel Stakes (gr. IIT) last time for trainer James Cassidy, returned $3.40 and $2.80. Should Candy paid $4.40 t


http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racin...
Category:
Sports
Tags:
2011SunshineMillionsTurfS.

Link to this comment: Share to:
see all
All Comments (1)
Respond to this video...

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment! I really love this horse. He might be my personal favorite horse currently running. I've followed him since he was 2, and won the Cal Breeders stakes at Santa Anita, and he never really has put in a disappointing performance, I don't think he was quite ready for the Preakness, I can forgive that one, he didn't run TERRIBLE there. He's a horse I will continue to follow and keep my eye out for. Great run here, next up is the Kilroe Mile vs Sidney's Candy, I'm sure he has the class to beat him.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

Meanwhile, Caracortado has shut you up. Don't worry, he's small, tries very hard, and may wear down again. Then, you can again tell us he's bad. Problem is that your boy (Beyer) has already given him a 102.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVnoPJfft_s

That's the video that should end this discussion.

Here are my posts about Caracortado last Spring....

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

Caracortado has about as much chance to win the Derby as me and the Fat Man in a horse suit.

Next.

That's it.

You're right on top of things as usual.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

I never said he'd win the Derby. I said he was worth 50-1 to win the Derby, and you said he's so bad that Chocolate Candy would beat him. You said he was my Derby choice. No matter how you manipulate it, he's now shown you he is better than you thought he was, and that I was correct for loving this horse's desire. Yes, Blind Luck n' Caracortado were the two three year olds I took a liking to last year. They showed me the most desire. They have turned out o.k. I am not ashamed of liking them.

Here is my post to you regarding Chocolate Candy....

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

You haven't paid yet for that obnoxiously bad opinion you had last year. That horse was so bad I can't even remember its name. I wanted to say Chocolate Candy, but this horse was so bad that even Chocolate Candy would whip its ass.

It never compared Caracortado to Chocolate Candy. I was mocking your terrible opinion from the previous year and saying THAT horse couldn't even beat Chocolate Candy.

Nice sniff out on Blind Luck. Any more 2:5 shots you want to pat yourself on the back for sniffing out?

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

Here is my post to you regarding Chocolate Candy....



It never compared Caracortado to Chocolate Candy. I was mocking your terrible opinion from the previous year and saying THAT horse couldn't even beat Chocolate Candy.

Nice sniff out on Blind Luck. Any more 2:5 shots you want to pat yourself on the back for sniffing out?

Yes, you mocked. How old are you, and you still do this? See, you caused the confusion. I didn't pick any horse in 2009. It was 2 years earlier. I said a horse should be considered as a contender, and you n' your sycophants all switched it to "my pick," because it's one of your many tricks....... That's how you confused me. You said Chocolate Candy from (2009) would beat some horse I liked (Yankee Bravo now seems to be that horse.) The horse (Yankee Bravo) got hurt in the 2008 Louisiana Derby. He was never the same after that day. They just kept running him, because he was a gelding they were trying to get claimed......Even if it was a bad horse, Caracortado isn't. Like I said, I think Caracortado is a small horse who eventually wore down on that heavy synthetic. Remains to be seen if they can keep something like that from happening again. It's never been a lack of class (which is what was claimed last year.)

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Rock, no to whatever you're asking about youtube. You were wrong about this horse, too. People expect this. That's why I didn't note it.

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

Yes, you mocked. How old are you, and you still do this? See, you caused the confusion. I didn't pick any horse in 2009. It was 2 years earlier. That's how you confused me. You said Chocolate Candy from (2009) would beat some horse I liked (Yankee Bravo now seems to be that horse.) The horse (Yankee Bravo) got hurt in the 2008 Louisiana Derby. He was never the same after that day. They just kept running him, because he was a gelding they were trying to get claimed......Even if it was a bad horse, Caracortado isn't. Like I said, I think Caracortado is a small horse who eventually wore down on that heavy synthetic. Remains to be seen if they can keep something like that from happening again. It's never been a lack of class (which is what was claimed last year.)

You shouldn't have edited. The first version was a lot less paranoid and crazy.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

You shouldn't have edited. The first version was a lot less paranoid and crazy.

I'm not crazy. I'm not paranoid. It's not like he n' myself communicate with each other often. If I was paranoid, I'd be on here writing him all the time. Like it, or not, he is the manipulative individual. How many times do I come comment about something he's said? No, folks, he comes to comment about me. It's always characterized the other way. Look at the front of this thread. He attacks. Look at the thread from last year that we're referring to. He comes in to comment about what I said. Your types, then come in calling me a nut. This is all repetitive. I see it. You guys do it over n' over again. People are just not aware enough to notice manipulative people. It takes saying how a trick is done, and that's boring to people. However, they aren't bored by the actual trick itself. My point (last year) about Caracortado, was that he was a real competitive horse. He immediately switched that to whether or not Caracortado was gunna win the Derby. That's something general switched to something very specific. He , then tied it to a horse from 2008 that I also never said was going to win the Derby. This is the same damn trick. See what I mean about repeating the same trick? Now, in 2011, when Caracortado has proven himself to be a very competitive horse, he switches it to what? The 2010 Kentucky Derby. Did I say he was gunna win that? No, never. He centered the discussion on that, because it's very hard to win. It's what he does. This individual is highly manipulative. On here, he has always been that way.

[Dahoss]

Well, I'm convinced.

[DaTruth]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

I'm not crazy. I'm not paranoid. way.

If you feel the need to begin your post with a self-serving certification of your sanity, then you may be crazy. As for the paranoid bit, just because you are paranoid doesn't mean you are wrong.

[iamthelurker]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

Here is my post to you regarding Chocolate Candy....



It never compared Caracortado to Chocolate Candy. I was mocking your terrible opinion from the previous year and saying THAT horse couldn't even beat Chocolate Candy.

Nice sniff out on Blind Luck. Any more 2:5 shots you want to pat yourself on the back for sniffing out?

And you tell me to go to class? Lol

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by iamthelurker

And you tell me to go to class? Lol

There's still genuine hope for you. He's a lost cause.

And so am I.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

Here is my post to you regarding Chocolate Candy....



It never compared Caracortado to Chocolate Candy. I was mocking your terrible opinion from the previous year and saying THAT horse couldn't even beat Chocolate Candy.

Nice sniff out on Blind Luck. Any more 2:5 shots you want to pat yourself on the back for sniffing out?

Narcissists rarely give anyone (except themselves) credit for anything. They (or their sycophants) just keep saying negative stuff about others, and keep saying good stuff about themselves......So, this is to protect myself from your false claims, and not to pat myself on the back. Oh, I can give you a thread that contradicts your false claim about me (on the 1st page of this thread,) but you will then switch to "I was kidding....Can you not even notice this?" I know your constant bullshyt switches. It's just like watching a madman swerving through traffic in a sportscar. When totally caught in a lie, you're always gunna switch to "I wasn't serious." I admit, most people are never gunna notice all the ways you manipulate a situation, but it's there. You do repeat them.