![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I guess it would help if I looked at the post date...before I go all smart-as$.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() This is the sort of stuff that can happen when goons bump threads from weeks ago in order to pat themselves on the back for predicting that a 2-5 shot would run big.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Looks like Blind Luck ran pretty damn big today...I believe, a 104 beyer for Blind Luck and a 100 beyer for runner up Tidal Pool.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Waste of your time to blame me, because I don't give a fk about the type of form complaint you made. I said she'd run huge in her return to dirt. Last time I looked, there's no place to bet on the ease of a win. I said above that she could compete with boys on dirt. Someone else popped up (like fresh dog poop) to say she had no chance at all. Note how people never complain when some people make unsubstantiated claims? My original entry was made a few days before the Santa Anita Oaks. I was trying to let people know she wasn't a good play in that. Sure enough, what happened? Got her ass beat. I said wait until she gets back on dirt. The difference is day n' night. Yesterday's post was a response to someone else. It's not for you. It's a piece of evidence that should be combined with the December race to back up my claim that she has a shot (on dirt) against the boys (which is what the original poster asked about.) This thread has nothing to do with your nosy ass...Zero.
Last edited by SCUDSBROTHER : 04-03-2010 at 11:37 AM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Is there gonna be a World War III, Mr. Nostradamus? Quote:
Or is dusting Tidal Pool enough substantiation? Quote:
Obviously, I don't have the influence to affect odds they way you do though, as those two were both a bit higher than 2-5. Bump. |