|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
01-11-2011, 04:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
[quote=dellinger63;741743]I guess we'll have to go with the facts. He did go towards gunshots with a gun in his pocket and not in his hand. Call me crazy but even if he had drawn and went towards the gunshots he's a hero in my mind.
To you it somehow matters and that seems even more odd to me now.[/QUOTE Sigh. My head hurts. It makes no difference to me in thinking he is a hero or not. Whether his gun was drawn or not makes no difference to me either (and he gets credit for being smart enough not to pull it out and display it) I simply was wondering if he didn't have a gun at all on his person, would he still have gone towards shots?
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts 
|
|
#2
01-11-2011, 04:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I took that as in your opinion 'Joe' would not have been so brave w/o a gun when in fact he went outside, gun in pocket, not drawn to offer aid so my guess would have been yes he would have. You however have always seemed to have had insight into the lives and thoughts of people you don't even know. You maybe right. Not that it matters or is even worth wondering about?
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson Last edited by dellinger63 : 01-11-2011 at 06:11 PM.
|
Hybrid Mode
