Obama Report Card -Vote and be counted!

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

I keep wanting to do this.. but cant bring myself to do it yet.

Who else is capable of predicting Obama in a landslide and then saying (in regards to ObamaCare) "He was willing to sacrifice a second term to it, and he got it done (the start)." within a couple of days?

She's like an old steam locomotive, in the way of a bullet train, refusing to pull off the track. The steam is building and she'll eventually blow!

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Who else is capable of predicting Obama in a landslide and then saying (in regards to ObamaCare) "He was willing to sacrifice a second term to it, and he got it done (the start)." within a couple of days?

She's like an old steam locomotive, in the way of a bullet train, refusing to pull off the track. The steam is building and she'll eventually blow!

hey at least she didnt accuse you of not planning for your own retirement.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

hey at least she didnt accuse you of not planning for your own retirement.

You mean where I didn't do that, where I said, "You (the general you, not you specifically)" ??

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Riot

You mean where I didn't do that, where I said, "You (the general you, not you specifically)" ??

actually your last sentence had nothing to do with the paragraph were you said "you (the general you, not you specifically).

If you want to backtrack now that you look foolish, than that is what we expect.

But, "And if you think you are truly screwed then not already having retirement plans in place and actively being funded makes no sense at all to me" was about ME specifically.. since I'm the one who specifically used the word "screwed". Please tell me how that wasnt directed to me?

Is that specific enough?

Good backtrack.. doesnt work though.

Your post wasnt too bad until you threw in that last, holier than thou remark that we are all used to.

[Riot]

actually your last sentence had nothing to do with the paragraph were you said "you (the general you, not you specifically).

If you want to backtrack now that you look foolish, than that is what we expect.

Sure.

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Riot

Sure.

gfy

Coach can you hook me up with a middle finger emoticon?

Thank Jeebus there is only one Riot in the world.. well there may be a few more like her in Europe.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

gfy

Coach can you hook me up with a middle finger emoticon?

Thank Jeebus there is only one Riot in the world.. well there may be a few more like her in Europe.

ROFLMAO I win!

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Who else is capable of predicting Obama in a landslide and then saying (in regards to ObamaCare) "He was willing to sacrifice a second term to it, and he got it done (the start)." within a couple of days?

Well, Dell, I'm glad you've picked up a new quote from me you can keep putting forth out of context, in an effort to prove how simplistic and simpleminded you are about political discourse

Obama has said himself, he'd be willing to sacrifice a second term if he could get healthcare and nuclear proliferation limitations accomplished. He's said it. That's no secret.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

Well, Dell, I'm glad you've picked up a new quote from me you can keep putting forth out of context, in an effort to prove how simplistic and simpleminded you are about political discourse

Obama has said himself, he'd be willing to sacrifice a second term if he could get healthcare and nuclear proliferation limitations accomplished. He's said it. That's no secret.

OK this is getting 'Carter' complex.

So despite Obama's willingness to sacrifice a second term for passing his healthcare he will win a second term in a landslide because the GOP has no one to run?

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

Obama has said himself, he'd be willing to sacrifice a second term if he could get healthcare and nuclear proliferation limitations accomplished. He's said it. That's no secret.

Oh oh

Title IX Revenue Provisions—Subtitle A:

Revenue Offset
"(Sec. 9002) Requires employers to include in the W-2 form of each employee the aggregate cost of applicable employer-sponsored group health coverage
that is excludable from the employee's gross income (excluding the value of
contributions to flexible spending arrangements)."

This is what they meant when they said we need to pass it to find out what's inside. Surprise, surprise.