![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
i understand the way the system works. its pretty arrogant to think i dont as you have no idea what my experience is. i also understand that you cant look at the way other tracks do business and compare it to this meet because there is no guarantee there will even be racing in new jersey next year if this isnt a big success. it will be interesting to revisit this thread after the meet. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
People here make proclamations of certainty all the time that aren't true. Do you think that the horseman's association isn't aware with how much has been paid out? Do you think they do not monitor the numbers? You understand that they are contractually obligated to do this? Perhaps Monmouth will add money to the purses toward the end of the meet? Perhaps they will add money to the stakes as well? Perhaps they will simply carry the money forward to the fall meet and increase the purse levels there? Perhaps all the races on haskell day will be boosted to 100k? Perhaps they will have a big party with the money? As for the idea that there will be no racing in NJ if this isnt a big success...If that is so (and all signs are that it is) then why would they underpay the purses? To save the money for a meet that wont take place? They have a 12 million dollar stakes schedule. Through this weekend they will have paid out 3 million. After 36% of the meet they have only paid out 25% of the stakes money. That means obviously that the purses paid out on an average daily basis will be higher as the meet goes on. The uniqueness of the meet really isnt that it may be the last, etc. It is that they have scheduled two seperate meets with completely different purse structures. If there arent enough quality horses to fill all the scheduled allowance races during the first meet would it not make sense to hold over some of that money to the next meet as opposed to giving it away senselessly to keep up with some marketing slogan? I have no idea what they are doing nor do I really care. But the idea that each day would have $1 million dollars in purses is not only silly but easily refuted simply by looking at a condition book. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
like i said, it will be interesting to revisit this thread after the meet. im sure you still wont care then either, after being proven wrong. again. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Let me ask you a question GG. How close to $50 million do they have to give out for you not to declare that they never intended to give out the $50 million? $45 mill? $48mill? $49,999,999?
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Let me ask you a question, Chuck.....if you should ever train a horse that loses the KY Derby by a nose will you tell people you trained a KY Derby winner? Yes, I know, you would ( and should ) be ecstatic....but you would also be lying if you said you trained a Derby winner. It's a game of inches.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
of course if it is 49 million or close to that its close enough. but when the number is closer to 45 million i will be waiting for the excuses.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
May I ask.. why are you so worried about this?
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
AP was underpaid far more than (%wise) that last season. Thankfully I may add because it kept them from slashing the purses there this year. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
regulated? you got regulated on page 2 of this thread.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's nothing new... I'm just trying not to get emotional now.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
The bottom line is that there is a lot of defensive nitpicking in this thread. The gist of the original argument by Byk is correct. Nobody is criticizing the Monmouth meet from a fan's perspective ( nor should they ). But there is an underlying discussion, a white Elephant so to speak, and frankly this thread is making that even more abundantly clear.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |