![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs." |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Not "bashing" Goldilocks … just happen to think that top classic distance runners (like Z) are superior to strict milers. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I generally agree, and I would still take Goldikova over Zenyatta every day of the week and twice on Sunday. Her accomplishments dwarf Zenyatta's that heavily.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why, because they're running a mile and not some artificially arbitrary distance that measures superiority?
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs." |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
IMO Zenyatta is not a horse you can measure with speed figs or final times as in other horses, who knows maybe all that are in her corner are totally wrong about her, we've been hoodwinked by the campaign and Sheriff's great placement of 17 times in her career
thats how the greats are measured as you say why is zen not measured the same way.. your basic problem that i can see is that most all people like the horse..'i also think she is fantasic and a joy to see race' just not to the extent that she is in the same time zone with the 'great' horses of the past..the ones that get measured by who they ran vs and where and with speed figs and final times..get past all that and zen is no 1 |