Michelle Calls Barack a "Kenyan"

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

You would have to be a fool to not at least have some doubt about where he was born. He refuses to show his birth certificate. Not only that, he is spending millions of dollars on lawyers to keep his birth certificate hidden. In addition, there are all kinds of records that could shed light on where he was born that he refuses to release.

There is no evidence that he was born in Hawaii. There is none. If you choose to believe that he was born there just because that is the mainstream opinion, that is fine with me. I'm sure you would have been one of the guys that argued the Earth was flat even after evidence started to come out that it was round.

At least I can give you guys reasons why I think he wasn't born in Hawaii. I have yet to hear any reasons as to why you guys think he was born in Hawaii. All you can say is that "birthers are crazy" and that type of thing but you don't have any evidence to support your point of view.

actually the opposite.. you have to be a COMPLETE fool to buy into this stuff.

But from someone who compared Gay rights to the PGA tour, it doesnt surprise me.

[Rupert Pupkin]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

actually the opposite.. you have to be a COMPLETE fool to buy into this stuff.

But from someone who compared Gay rights to the PGA tour, it doesnt surprise me.

The thing about the PGA Tour was an analogy. Have you ever heard of an analogy? An analogy is not about two identical things. It's about two totally different things that have similarities. That is why it's called an analogy.

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

The thing about the PGA Tour was an analogy. Have you ever heard of an analogy? An analogy is not about two identical things. It's about two totally different things that have similarities. That is why it's called an analogy.

yeah but it was a ridiculous analogy

[Rupert Pupkin]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

yeah but it was a ridiculous analogy

I don't take that as an insult because I'm sure you would think that any analogy that doesn't make a good case for gay marriage is a bad analogy.

Let's hear you come up with an analogy that would argue against gay marriage. That shouldn't be hard for you to do. I can always argue either side of an issue. You should be able to do it.

If you can't come up with one, then you will prove my case. My case being that you would think any analogy is bad that doesn't make a gay marriage ban look like a huge injustice.

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

I don't take that as an insult because I'm sure you would think that any analogy that doesn't make a good case for gay marriage is a bad analogy.

Let's hear you come up with an analogy that would argue against gay marriage. That shouldn't be hard for you to do. I can always argue either side of an issue. You should be able to do it.

If you can't come up with one, then you will prove my case. My case being that you would think any analogy is bad that doesn't make a gay marriage ban look like a huge injustice.

that could be very well true.

I will say, your analogy was better than the "Bible" arguements that always follow the gay marriage debate.