Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-05-2010, 09:08 AM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AeWingnut View Post
no

they are the result of criminal activity.

I was born from legal citizens as were my parents and so on who were born from American citizens not commiting crimes.

Liberals have already ignored the Constitution.(with the support of non-constructionists) Yet they mock people that want to actually have a Constitutional form of government and say "change it".
LOL isn't that a two sided coin? Danzig made a great point of that not too long ago. We all do it. Conservatives act like the founding fathers stumbled upon the burning bush and from God's lips came the constitution and it should be adhered to strictly...until it doesn't fit some far right or bible belt agenda. Liberals (I say "we") think it is open to interpretation and change and then hide behind it when it suits some "we are the world", save the seals thing.

I think we have come a long way as a society since a group of white men with wigs, false teeth and bad breath had the ONLY say in the way the country was run. Is it fair to say that maybe, just maybe, the constitution might be a bit...outdated in some spots. Maybe?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-05-2010, 09:48 AM
clyde's Avatar
clyde clyde is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Welsh Pride!
Posts: 13,837
Default

^^^^ Still sits on eggs holding mirror.Practices Ann Coulter muggy faces.



Is usually wrong, but thinks she's right.

Fits.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-05-2010, 10:01 AM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-05-2010, 10:51 AM
Princess Doreen's Avatar
Princess Doreen Princess Doreen is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: VA and Saratoga
Posts: 1,352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani View Post
LOL isn't that a two sided coin? Danzig made a great point of that not too long ago. We all do it. Conservatives act like the founding fathers stumbled upon the burning bush and from God's lips came the constitution and it should be adhered to strictly...until it doesn't fit some far right or bible belt agenda. Liberals (I say "we") think it is open to interpretation and change and then hide behind it when it suits some "we are the world", save the seals thing.

I think we have come a long way as a society since a group of white men with wigs, false teeth and bad breath had the ONLY say in the way the country was run. Is it fair to say that maybe, just maybe, the constitution might be a bit...outdated in some spots. Maybe?

__________________
I l Cigar, Medaglia d'Oro, Big Brown, Curlin, Rachel Alexandra, Silver Charm, First Samurai, Sumwonlovesyou, Lloydobler, Ausable Chasm, AND Prince Will I Am

"Be daring, be different, be impractical, be anything that will assert integrity of purpose and imaginative vision against the play-it-safers, the creatures of the commonplace, the slaves of the ordinary.” Cecil Beaton
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-05-2010, 12:48 PM
brianwspencer's Avatar
brianwspencer brianwspencer is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Doreen View Post
LOLZ! Good one!!!!1!11!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-05-2010, 02:29 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Doreen View Post
LOL.

And for that very reason, we have the Legislative and Judicial branches
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-05-2010, 09:21 PM
letswastemoney's Avatar
letswastemoney letswastemoney is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Turlock, CA
Posts: 2,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Doreen View Post
I like Obama in respects to almost everything, except his immigration stance, but we have something in place to prevent electing a disastrous president.

Most of the Electoral College technically does not have to follow what the states vote for!!! It's only tradition that they do. If they really felt someone was going to ruin this country, they'd vote for whoever they want.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-05-2010, 09:24 PM
Princess Doreen's Avatar
Princess Doreen Princess Doreen is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: VA and Saratoga
Posts: 1,352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by letswastemoney View Post
I like Obama in respects to almost
Most of the Electoral College technically does not have to follow what the states vote for!!! It's only tradition that they do. If they really felt someone was going to ruin this country, they'd vote for whoever they want.
I'm for doing away with the Electoral College. There really isn't a need for it any longer - it is a tradition, not a need.

The problem with electing a President is we don't know what a truly F****** moron he/she is until AFTER elected - despite all the warnings beforehand.
__________________
I l Cigar, Medaglia d'Oro, Big Brown, Curlin, Rachel Alexandra, Silver Charm, First Samurai, Sumwonlovesyou, Lloydobler, Ausable Chasm, AND Prince Will I Am

"Be daring, be different, be impractical, be anything that will assert integrity of purpose and imaginative vision against the play-it-safers, the creatures of the commonplace, the slaves of the ordinary.” Cecil Beaton
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-05-2010, 11:05 PM
brianwspencer's Avatar
brianwspencer brianwspencer is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Doreen View Post
I'm for doing away with the Electoral College. There really isn't a need for it any longer - it is a tradition, not a need.

The problem with electing a President is we don't know what a truly F****** moron he/she is until AFTER elected - despite all the warnings beforehand.
Good point, we'd be in Dem control for something close to 20 years now if we hadn't had it!

Three cheers for Doreen!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-05-2010, 11:31 PM
hi_im_god's Avatar
hi_im_god hi_im_god is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,043
Default

all this talk of changing the constitution and national id's is way too much work and completely misses the point.

what we really need is an easy way of distinguishing brown people that are here legally from those that are here illegally.

i propose small yellow fabric sombrero's that anyone with brown skin or a strange sounding surname has to pin to their outer clothing if they're a citizen. the government can provide these and no one who isn't breaking the law could possibly object.

we can tattoo numbers on the arms of those here illegally, just to make sure they don't come back, and ship them somewhere away from us.

problem solved.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-06-2010, 06:47 AM
Nascar1966 Nascar1966 is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hi_im_god View Post
all this talk of changing the constitution and national id's is way too much work and completely misses the point.

what we really need is an easy way of distinguishing brown people that are here legally from those that are here illegally.

i propose small yellow fabric sombrero's that anyone with brown skin or a strange sounding surname has to pin to their outer clothing if they're a citizen. the government can provide these and no one who isn't breaking the law could possibly object.

we can tattoo numbers on the arms of those here illegally, just to make sure they don't come back, and ship them somewhere away from us.

problem solved.
The only way to solve the problem is to get rid of the worthless illegals.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-06-2010, 06:31 AM
joeydb's Avatar
joeydb joeydb is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 3,044
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brianwspencer View Post
Good point, we'd be in Dem control for something close to 20 years now if we hadn't had it!

Three cheers for Doreen!
Putting aside for a minute that "in Democratic control" is the opposite of what most of us would call "freedom", I doubt it. We would have had this disaster of a Democratic president sooner, and then the country would have went on a Republican voting spree, like with Carter and Reagan.

In 1984, 49 states went Red for Reagan, so the Electoral College didn't mean anything.

Or, if you're right, the dollar would have already collapsed...then the Dems can take off the masks and be the communists they really are.

For what it's worth I agree with both sides that the Electoral College is an anachronism, but to eliminate it the first thing you'd need is a foolproof way to get the fraud out of the system. No more voting multiple times and/or preventing the authorities from requiring ID.

In the interim, the system would be made better by getting rid of the "winner take all" rules in the states, where, if 49% of people vote for a candidate, their vote is basically ignored in favor of the 51% in terms of electoral votes. That's just ridiculous.

If I had the power to shape the system, I would proportionately award the electoral votes from the House seats based on the popular vote within the state, but would award the two Senate electoral votes to the winner of that state. So if California went 60% Democrat, 40% Republican, the Democrat would get the 2 Senate electoral votes, and 60% of the House electoral votes, (round up for the winner): which is 0.6*53 = 31.8 -> 32. The Republican would get 19.

This would at least be a better approximation to the popular vote, and it still satisfies the Constitution on using an electoral college, since I don't think the Constitution tells any state how to award their votes, and in fact 2 states currently do not use "winner take all".
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-06-2010, 08:42 AM
brianwspencer's Avatar
brianwspencer brianwspencer is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joeydb View Post
If I had the power to shape the system, I would proportionately award the electoral votes from the House seats based on the popular vote within the state, but would award the two Senate electoral votes to the winner of that state. So if California went 60% Democrat, 40% Republican, the Democrat would get the 2 Senate electoral votes, and 60% of the House electoral votes, (round up for the winner): which is 0.6*53 = 31.8 -> 32. The Republican would get 19.

This would at least be a better approximation to the popular vote, and it still satisfies the Constitution on using an electoral college, since I don't think the Constitution tells any state how to award their votes, and in fact 2 states currently do not use "winner take all".
This has always struck me as a better way of doing it.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-06-2010, 09:27 PM
ateamstupid's Avatar
ateamstupid ateamstupid is offline
Super Mod.. and Super Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 13,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joeydb View Post
Putting aside for a minute that "in Democratic control" is the opposite of what most of us would call "freedom", I doubt it. We would have had this disaster of a Democratic president sooner, and then the country would have went on a Republican voting spree, like with Carter and Reagan.
Would have gone.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-06-2010, 06:46 AM
Nascar1966 Nascar1966 is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brianwspencer View Post
Good point, we'd be in Dem control for something close to 20 years now if we hadn't had it!

Three cheers for Doreen!
This country would be really screwed if the Dems controlled it for close to 20 years.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-06-2010, 07:35 AM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nascar1966 View Post
This country would be really screwed if the Dems controlled it for close to 20 years.
not really. Bush was basically a Dem fiscally.. and also pandered to the religious right. I doubt Gore would have done much worse.

We just need a real fiscal conservative.. & one who doesnt give a damn about the religious right.. to be in office.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-06-2010, 08:12 AM
Princess Doreen's Avatar
Princess Doreen Princess Doreen is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: VA and Saratoga
Posts: 1,352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brianwspencer View Post
Good point, we'd be in Dem control for something close to 20 years now if we hadn't had it!

Three cheers for Doreen!
You're assuming Gore would have been re-elected? HAH! That's a real knee slapper. I think the Dems would have been laughed out of the two elections since 2000 had we had that bozo for President. Bush did get the popular vote in 2004.

But, it doesn't change my mind about the Electoral College.

And, my comment about a godless nation was in response to whomsoever it was and those who agreed about deporting religious people from the USA

And, please stop trying to teach history lessons. I'd accept them if y'all didn't make so many mistakes.
__________________
I l Cigar, Medaglia d'Oro, Big Brown, Curlin, Rachel Alexandra, Silver Charm, First Samurai, Sumwonlovesyou, Lloydobler, Ausable Chasm, AND Prince Will I Am

"Be daring, be different, be impractical, be anything that will assert integrity of purpose and imaginative vision against the play-it-safers, the creatures of the commonplace, the slaves of the ordinary.” Cecil Beaton
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-06-2010, 03:58 AM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Doreen View Post
I'm for doing away with the Electoral College. There really isn't a need for it any longer - it is a tradition, not a need.

The problem with electing a President is we don't know what a truly F****** moron he/she is until AFTER elected - despite all the warnings beforehand.

do you understand why the electoral college was put in place? it certainly wasn't so the founding fathers could create a tradition! now, if many are in favor of no longer giving each state equal say in who leads the federal govt, then there could be a change. but i think many say get rid of it because they just don't understand why it's there, or what it was created for.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-06-2010, 05:34 AM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default

Also, if anyone could direct me to the part of the constitution that discusses god, and where it states we are formed as a christian nation, I would appreciate it.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-05-2010, 08:33 PM
Princess Doreen's Avatar
Princess Doreen Princess Doreen is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: VA and Saratoga
Posts: 1,352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani View Post
LOL isn't that a two sided coin? Danzig made a I think we have come a long way as a society since a group of white men with wigs, false teeth and bad breath had the ONLY say in the way the country was run. Is it fair to say that maybe, just maybe, the constitution might be a bit...outdated in some spots. Maybe?
Yeah, if a change is needed - how about this?

Subject: NEW PREAMBLE TO THE CONSTITUTION

We the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help
everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid more riots,
keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior, and secure the
blessings of a debt-free liberty to ourselves and our great-great-
great-grandchildren, hereby try one more time to ordain and establish
some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny,guilt
ridden, and delusional. We hold these truths to be self evident:
that a whole lot of people are confused by the Bill of Rights and are so
dim they require a Bill of NON-Rights.

ARTICLE I: You do not have the right to a new car, big screen TV, or
any other form of wealth. More power to you if you can legally acquire
them, but no one is guaranteeing anything.

ARTICLE II: You do not have the right to never be offended. This
country is based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone --
not just you! You may leave the room, turn the channel, express a
different opinion, etc.; but the world is full of idiots, and probably always
will be.

ARTICLE III: You do not have the right to be free from harm. If you
stick a screwdriver in your eye, learn to be more careful; do not expect
the tool manufacturer to make you and all your relatives independently
wealthy.

ARTICLE IV: You do not have the right to free food and housing.
Americans are the most charitable people to be found, and will gladly
help anyone in need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing
generation after generation of couch potatoes who achieve nothing more
than the creation of another generation of professional couch potatoes.
Get an education and go to work. ...don't expect everyone else to take
care of you!

ARTICLE V: You do not have the right to free health care. That would
be nice, but from the looks of public housing, we're just not interested
in public health care.

ARTICLE VI: You do not have the right to physically harm other people.
If you kidnap, rape, intentionally maim, or kill someone, don't be
surprised if the rest of us want to see you fry in the electric chair.

ARTICLE VII: You do not have the right to the possessions of others.
If you rob, cheat, or coerce away the goods or services of other
citizens, don't be surprised if the rest of us get together and lock you
away in a place where you still won't have the right to a big screen
color TV or a life of leisure.

ARTICLE VIII: You do not have the right to a job. All of us sure want
you to have a job, and will gladly help you along in hard times, but we
expect you to take advantage of the opportunities of education and
vocational training laid before you to make yourself useful.

ARTICLE IX: You do not have the right to happiness. Being an American
means that you have the right to PURSUE happiness, which by the way, is
a lot easier if you are unencumbered by an over abundance of idiotic
laws created by those of you who were confused by the Bill of Rights.

ARTICLE X: _This is an English speaking country. We don't care where
you are from, English is our language. Learn it or go back to
wherever you came from!

(Lastly....)

ARTICLE XI: You do not have the right to change our country's history
or heritage. This country was founded on the belief in one true God. And
yet, you are given the freedom to believe in any religion, any faith, or
no faith at all; with no fear of persecution _The phrase IN GOD WE TRUST
is part of our heritage and history, and if you are uncomfortable with
it, TOUGH!
__________________
I l Cigar, Medaglia d'Oro, Big Brown, Curlin, Rachel Alexandra, Silver Charm, First Samurai, Sumwonlovesyou, Lloydobler, Ausable Chasm, AND Prince Will I Am

"Be daring, be different, be impractical, be anything that will assert integrity of purpose and imaginative vision against the play-it-safers, the creatures of the commonplace, the slaves of the ordinary.” Cecil Beaton
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.