![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
LOL
![]() I'm giving up my hypothesis. On to Pimlico...and the crackheads. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Sorry for being a smartass. I'm thinking about driving up. Would be the first missed Preakness since 1996 for me if I don't. Are you going?
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Those pick 4's, none of which i hit, were quite hittable and quite large. Always depressing after the fact. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Trying to talk the wife into it. We will let you know.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Approximate internal fractions, FWIW:
Super Saver: 23.53, 47.31, 1:11.64, 1:37.90, 2:04.45 (:26.55 last 1/4) Noble's Promise: 23.57, 47.06, 1:11.15, 1:37.65, 2:05.43 (:27.78 last 1/4) |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Putting the Derby aside for a second, this is what I don't get about the dude's analysis. He talks about how so and so made "this run" and "that move" but if you completely ignore fractions, how the hell do you know if a horse was really accelerating or if the others were slowing down? For instance, sometimes in races (especially routes), a horse or two will separate from the field early, then three or four horses will catch up quickly down the backstretch. This doesn't make sense visually until you see that the fractions were something like :23 and :49. If horses get closer during a slow quarter after being far behind during a fast one, that doesn't mean they were making an early move, nor should they be given extra credit if they win with "another" move.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Ice Box :26.35 :23.94 :24.03 :24.45 :26.10 Lezcano J 11.70 Paddy O'Prado :24.40 :23.84 :24.10 :25.69 :26.89 Desormeaux K J 12.30 Make Music for Me :26.86 :24.11 :23.69 :24.01 :26.59 Rosario J 30.00 Noble's Promise :23.62 :23.50 :24.06 :26.47 :27.82 Martinez W 24.90¨ Lookin At Lucky :25.84 :24.11 :24.11 :24.62 :26.95 Gomez G K 6.30 Dublin :24.74 :24.36 :23.74 :25.29 :27.60 Thompson T J 20.00 Stately Victor :25.42 :23.85 :24.08 :24.89 :27.69 Garcia Alan 20.20 Mission Impazible :23.24 :24.31 :24.34 :26.44 :27.95 Maragh R 16.70 Devil May Care :24.13 :23.77 :24.17 :25.86 :28.57 Velazquez J R 10.90 American Lion :23.60 :24.13 :24.35 :26.08 :29.48 Flores D R 23.20 Jackson Bend :23.87 :24.19 :24.52 :25.56 :29.54 Smith M E 23.00 Discreetly Mine :23.23 :24.06 :24.42 :26.34 :30.74 Castellano J J 31.60 Dean's Kitten :24.82 :23.84 :24.35 :26.27 :30.06 Albarado R J 25.70 Conveyance :22.63 :23.53 :24.42 :27.43 :33.80 Garcia M 27.00 Homeboykris :24.30 :24.47 :24.71 :27.60 :32.52 Dominguez R A 27.00 Sidney's Candy :22.80 :23.62 :24.34 :27.84 :35.09 Talamo J 9.50 Line of David :23.14 :23.96 :24.62 :28.67 :34.35 Bejarano R 19.90 Awesome Act :25.16 :24.02 :24.20 :26.32 :35.07 Leparoux J R 11.60 Backtalk :24.31 :24.43 :24.62 :27.44 :35.58 Mena M 23.10 Judging by the fourth quarter mile It looks like the leaders were backing up and NP simply inherited the lead. I can't see anything to indicate he was the one to "collapse the race". Last edited by Kasept : 05-03-2010 at 05:48 PM. |