Eagles Thumping Giants

[3kings]

Originally Posted by King Glorious

So Nicks averages more yards per game, more per catch, more yards after the catch, has one less total touchdown in about 30 less touches and has done all of this in two less games...........and Harvin's production towers over him? I'm completely lost.

As a reciever they are comparible but I was considering total contribution to his team. Harvin has been spectacular on special teams.

These are Mike Wallace's stats:
21 catchs for 368 yds 17.5 per catch 2 TD's

He was the 4th reciever for the first couple games of the season. He as yet to start a game and plays maybe half the snaps. So has Mike Wallace been better than Nicks?

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by 3kings

As a reciever they are comparible but I was considering total contribution to his team. Harvin has been spectacular on special teams.

These are Mike Wallace's stats:
21 catchs for 368 yds 17.5 per catch 2 TD's

He was the 4th reciever for the first couple games of the season. He as yet to start a game and plays maybe half the snaps. So has Mike Wallace been better than Nicks?

Absolutely. And look at where the catches came. They were important plays in the middle of tight games as opposed to garbage time stats in blow outs.

I think at the end of the day thats the point. Not just that Harvin has made more plays but that the plays he made actually MATTERED.

[Cannon Shell]

Still no sign of Nicks on the Scouts inc rookie list

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4618971

[SniperSB23]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Still no sign of Nicks on the Scouts inc rookie list

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4618971

What really sucks is the Bills could have taken Cushing instead of Maybin at #11 like many were projecting and have both the top two for defensive ROY.