Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   Sports Bar & Grill (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Eagles Thumping Giants (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=32553)

docicu3 11-01-2009 01:30 PM

Eagles Thumping Giants
 




Where did these receivers come from that are making highlight play after play. First Jackson again then this rookie makes a first rate great catch in traffic.....They put up 30 in a half. What else can you want?

ateamstupid 11-01-2009 01:36 PM

Sooner or later people are going to have to confront the idea that the Giants aren't that good.

King Glorious 11-01-2009 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid
Sooner or later people are going to have to confront the idea that the Giants aren't that good.

Saying they aren't that good gives them too much credit.

This looks like pro versus college. Division II college.

Cannon Shell 11-01-2009 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
Saying they aren't that good gives them too much credit.

This looks like pro versus college. Division II college.

How bad would they be without the NFL's best rookie?

MISTERGEE 11-01-2009 05:12 PM

they dont have Pat White.

Cannon Shell 11-01-2009 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MISTERGEE
they dont have Pat White.

KG knows who i am talking about

philcski 11-01-2009 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
How bad would they be without the NFL's best rookie?

how bad would this team be without the NFL's best rookie
http://www.nfl.com/players/jairusbyr...e?id=BYR449897

King Glorious 11-01-2009 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
How bad would they be without the NFL's best rookie?

Even worse.

philcski 11-01-2009 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
How bad would they be without the NFL's best rookie?

Hakeem Nicks?? I have no idea who you are referring to

Cannon Shell 11-01-2009 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski
Hakeem Nicks?? I have no idea who you are referring to

KG's guy Hakeem. you were busy last week while we were discussing this.

King Glorious 11-01-2009 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
KG's guy Hakeem. you were busy last week while we were discussing this.

Instead of telling me he's not the best rookie, maybe you could tell me who is and then give me undeniable proof that he is. I'm only giving my opinion on the matter since there's no such thing as a fact but if it's indeed a fact that I'm wrong, please correct me.

Cannon Shell 11-01-2009 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
Instead of telling me he's not the best rookie, maybe you could tell me who is and then give me undeniable proof that he is. I'm only giving my opinion on the matter since there's no such thing as a fact but if it's indeed a fact that I'm wrong, please correct me.

So far Harvin is better.

King Glorious 11-01-2009 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
So far Harvin is better.

As expected. Thanks.

RockHardTen1985 11-01-2009 06:14 PM

Like I said, only 2 teams matter in the NFC

Cannon Shell 11-01-2009 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
As expected. Thanks.

you disagree? What would make you think that your guy is better than Harvin has been? It really isnt close considering Harvin is one of the best return men in the league as well. Please explain to me why Nicks is or has been better?

King Glorious 11-01-2009 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
you disagree? What would make you think that your guy is better than Harvin has been? It really isnt close considering Harvin is one of the best return men in the league as well. Please explain to me why Nicks is or has been better?

Oh, that's how it works? I give my opinion. You tell me I'm wrong. Then, without explaining your opinion, I'm supposed to explain mine? That's ok. I'll pass. You can have Harvin. I'll take Nicks.

dalakhani 11-01-2009 06:22 PM

I'll take Harvin.

GBBob 11-01-2009 06:27 PM

Unfortunately, so would I

Cannon Shell 11-01-2009 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
Oh, that's how it works? I give my opinion. You tell me I'm wrong. Then, without explaining your opinion, I'm supposed to explain mine? That's ok. I'll pass. You can have Harvin. I'll take Nicks.

What exactly did I do to get you in a huff? Harvin has more catches, more yards, more TD's, and fills two positions. I mean it is obvious stuff. And before you start with the Nicks was hurt stuff, Harvin has been playing banged up and sick. So Harvin it appears is more durable than Nicks as well. Enough?

Cannon Shell 11-01-2009 06:34 PM

And I think Nicks is good and who knows he may be great someday but KG insists that he is the best rookie bar none without much really "proving" it. I'm sure there are some defensive rookies that are doing at least as good as Phil pointed out but dont care enough to look.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.