Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-02-2010, 10:34 PM
ateamstupid's Avatar
ateamstupid ateamstupid is offline
Super Mod.. and Super Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 13,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philcski View Post
Time doesn't MATTER unless you're in JAIL.
Putting the Derby aside for a second, this is what I don't get about the dude's analysis. He talks about how so and so made "this run" and "that move" but if you completely ignore fractions, how the hell do you know if a horse was really accelerating or if the others were slowing down? For instance, sometimes in races (especially routes), a horse or two will separate from the field early, then three or four horses will catch up quickly down the backstretch. This doesn't make sense visually until you see that the fractions were something like :23 and :49. If horses get closer during a slow quarter after being far behind during a fast one, that doesn't mean they were making an early move, nor should they be given extra credit if they win with "another" move.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-03-2010, 01:48 PM
Port Conway Lane Port Conway Lane is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ateamstupid View Post
Putting the Derby aside for a second, this is what I don't get about the dude's analysis. He talks about how so and so made "this run" and "that move" but if you completely ignore fractions, how the hell do you know if a horse was really accelerating or if the others were slowing down? For instance, sometimes in races (especially routes), a horse or two will separate from the field early, then three or four horses will catch up quickly down the backstretch. This doesn't make sense visually until you see that the fractions were something like :23 and :49. If horses get closer during a slow quarter after being far behind during a fast one, that doesn't mean they were making an early move, nor should they be given extra credit if they win with "another" move.
Super Saver :23.58 :23.96 :24.15 :26.22 :26.55 Borel C H 8.00
Ice Box :26.35 :23.94 :24.03 :24.45 :26.10 Lezcano J 11.70
Paddy O'Prado :24.40 :23.84 :24.10 :25.69 :26.89 Desormeaux K J 12.30
Make Music for Me :26.86 :24.11 :23.69 :24.01 :26.59 Rosario J 30.00
Noble's Promise :23.62 :23.50 :24.06 :26.47 :27.82 Martinez W 24.90¨
Lookin At Lucky :25.84 :24.11 :24.11 :24.62 :26.95 Gomez G K 6.30
Dublin :24.74 :24.36 :23.74 :25.29 :27.60 Thompson T J 20.00
Stately Victor :25.42 :23.85 :24.08 :24.89 :27.69 Garcia Alan 20.20
Mission Impazible :23.24 :24.31 :24.34 :26.44 :27.95 Maragh R 16.70
Devil May Care :24.13 :23.77 :24.17 :25.86 :28.57 Velazquez J R 10.90
American Lion :23.60 :24.13 :24.35 :26.08 :29.48 Flores D R 23.20
Jackson Bend :23.87 :24.19 :24.52 :25.56 :29.54 Smith M E 23.00
Discreetly Mine :23.23 :24.06 :24.42 :26.34 :30.74 Castellano J J 31.60
Dean's Kitten :24.82 :23.84 :24.35 :26.27 :30.06 Albarado R J 25.70
Conveyance :22.63 :23.53 :24.42 :27.43 :33.80 Garcia M 27.00
Homeboykris :24.30 :24.47 :24.71 :27.60 :32.52 Dominguez R A 27.00
Sidney's Candy :22.80 :23.62 :24.34 :27.84 :35.09 Talamo J 9.50
Line of David :23.14 :23.96 :24.62 :28.67 :34.35 Bejarano R 19.90
Awesome Act :25.16 :24.02 :24.20 :26.32 :35.07 Leparoux J R 11.60
Backtalk :24.31 :24.43 :24.62 :27.44 :35.58 Mena M 23.10

Judging by the fourth quarter mile It looks like the leaders were backing up and NP simply inherited the lead. I can't see anything to indicate he was the one to "collapse the race".

Last edited by Kasept : 05-03-2010 at 04:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-03-2010, 02:00 PM
slotdirt's Avatar
slotdirt slotdirt is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,894
Default

Michael Johnson in his prime would have given those last few finishers a run for their money in a foot race from the quarter pole.
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs."
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-03-2010, 02:03 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Port Conway Lane View Post

Judging by the fourth quarter mile It looks like the leaders were backing up and NP simply inherited the lead. I can't see anything to indicate he was the one to "collapse the race".
Once again, not to discredit what you are pointing out, but it may be more than the fractions. Noble's Promise made a classic premature move that triggered the ensuing collapse. It was partially timing....but it's worth thinking about.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-03-2010, 02:09 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

At best it cost him 4th place. That last quarter was brutal.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-03-2010, 02:11 PM
Port Conway Lane Port Conway Lane is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind View Post
Once again, not to discredit what you are pointing out, but it may be more than the fractions. Noble's Promise made a classic premature move that triggered the ensuing collapse. It was partially timing....but it's worth thinking about.
I understand and I'll have to watch the race again. I suppose it's possible that within that fourth quarter he ran faster the second portion than SS did even though SS fourth quarter was faster (at least according to the charts).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-03-2010, 02:35 PM
Port Conway Lane Port Conway Lane is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,463
Default

I've watched the race again and NBC showed the overhead view. If any premature move was made by NP it was going into the first turn where he went from a half length behind SS to 2 1/2 lengths ahead of him. From that point in the race to the finish at no point did he gain any ground on SS.

NP was one off the rail around the far turn while SS was against the rail so I suppose any ground loss has to be taken into consideration.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-03-2010, 04:13 PM
ateamstupid's Avatar
ateamstupid ateamstupid is offline
Super Mod.. and Super Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 13,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Port Conway Lane View Post
Judging by the fourth quarter mile It looks like the leaders were backing up and NP simply inherited the lead. I can't see anything to indicate he was the one to "collapse the race".
This is exactly my point, and why I said I don't understand how one can determine who's accelerating and when if one ignores fractions.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-03-2010, 04:14 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,942
Default

Noble's Promise, who had the lead in the Derby at the quarter pole but was overtaken by Super Saver and Calvin Borel and finished fifth, has been moved from “doubtful” to “possible” by trainer Kenny McPeek after meeting with the managing partners of Chasing Dreams Racing 2008 this afternoon at McPeek’s Magdalena Farm in Lexington.

“He ran a great race,” added McPeek. “ He is a special colt. Does he have distance limitations? We have to admit he might have them. Do we tinker and see if we can get him to go that far? We’re willing to try.”
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-03-2010, 04:27 PM
Port Conway Lane Port Conway Lane is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ateamstupid View Post
This is exactly my point, and why I said I don't understand how one can determine who's accelerating and when if one ignores fractions.
Which is why I quoted your statement to begin with. I think that statement is most pertinent to the issue of whether he was the one that collapsed the race. If NP did not separate himself from SS during the period of time that the leaders were faltering then I don't understand how he was responsible for that collapse.

As far as the fractions are concerned they only substantiate what appears to be the leaders collapsing into the rest of the field.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.