![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() This is a pretty incredible thread about a no-brainer DQ.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Considering that horses get butchered every year in the Derby and the stewards never DQ anyone, I don't know if I would ever call any DQ in the Derby a "no-brainer".
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() That’s really the only reason I thought they might leave him up - “because it’s the derby” - and that’s not a very good reason. I can’t recall the last time the Derby winner interfered with a horse this badly, though.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Ouch
That smarts. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() This. I'd love for Rupert to show me where a Derby winner fouled another horse that badly at that crucial point of a race and didn't get DQ'ed. Pretty ridiculous to suggest that there should be different rules for the Derby than a $5,000 claimer.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I really think they should of tried to get some of that standing water off the track. That being said, if you you want to run the biggest 3 year old race of the year on that surface, then, I think they should only take the winner down if they think he wasn't best. Horses aren't gunna be able to stay that straight running on that surface.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Once the DQ is decided on, it doesn't matter whether the "winner" ends up being a horse that was probably not going to win- the horse taken down gets placed behind the one it affected (which the stewards correctly determined was Long Range Toddy.)
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|