![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Still I don't get how the derby was assigned a 104, that's fine I will gladly stick to not knowing and use this as leverage when people do blindly bet to this relatively "high" number.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Derby horses are overbet regardless of whether the number is 120 or 90.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() What was the figure for Pickapocket's allowance win (8.5F in 1:43.2)?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() 99
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If that's the case, and assuming the Derby figure is relative to the other two-turn races on the card, if the Derby figure were "off," it's probably only at best a length or two off.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() From Beyer's Washington Post Column:
Super Saver's winning tine of 2:04.45 was the slowest since 1989. The Churchill Downs racing strip was slow, of course, but even when the track condition is taken into account, the race still produced a modest Beyer Speed Figure of 104, the second-lowest for the Derby in 20 years. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...16.html?sub=AR |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() NTAMM, further to your reply last night.
I agree with Beyer 100% on this quote: This trouble doesn't mean that Ice Box is the most talented horse of this group or that he is likely to win the Preakness. The fast pace made this Derby a perfect set-up for stretch-runners like him. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Ok, can someone who routinely uses speed figures, doesn't bash them, and has a somewhat cursory to average understanding of how they are made get an explanation of how on Earth that Derby receives a 104?
Because it's not about bashing Beyer, it's not about bashing the number, it's that the number seems way out of line...and I don't understand how it was made on this particular day or the reasoning behind it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|