![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I say this with all due respect, but this is the first time I've ever heard someone say that clipping heels is basically no big deal in the context of lost momentum.
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs." |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
NT |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
His loss of ground in the Rebel wasn't huge as you say, but it appeared he did have momentum and was unwinding to go by others when it happened. Actual loss maybe a length or two, but that's not the real story. Just my opinion.
__________________
Do I think Charity can win? Well, I am walking around in yesterday's suit. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
1) still being carried along by the draft 2) able to make up whatever difference was lost easily, as those breaking before you have only a finite amount of energy and they've used it before you. In fact, 'checking' is an ADVANTAGE in these cases. If you're outside and not drafting, and you're dropped because you're forced to check, it's a lot harder to make up. Of course, it really depends on how intense the 'break' was. If they went too hard, you still have an advantage -- especially if the 'race' collapses and favors late runners. If you're going to remark that cycling is not horse racing, I will point you to Mr Dominguez and how he rides them like track bikes. P.S. The reason this isn't obvious is because of the BIAS on dirt tracks. DIRT goes against PHYSICS. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
dirt goes against physics?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|