Who Did the Derby Gods Frown On The Most and Why

[clambeau]

Hansen....no explanation needed

[tanner12oz]

gemologist

what a disappointment...didnt show up at all and havent heard any excuse thus far

[Thunder Gulch]

Take Charge Indy. Was set up with a perfect trip and took a bad step when it was time to move

[MaTH716]

Originally Posted by clambeau

Hansen....no explanation needed

I don't understand this at all. He actually finished better than I thought he would.

Originally Posted by tanner12oz

gemologist

what a disappointment...didnt show up at all and havent heard any excuse thus far

I don't think it was a matter of God frowing on him, he's just not good enough.

Originally Posted by Thunder Gulch

Take Charge Indy. Was set up with a perfect trip and took a bad step when it was time to move

Obviously it's a shame TCI got hurt, but I don't think he was shooting up the rail to win.

My answer would be Union Rags, terrible start, checked sharply on the backstretch and still ran 6th. I'm not saying he was gonna win, but with a clean trip he certainly could have made some noise.

[Travis Stone]

The Derby Gods frowned upon everyone who thought that someone would push Little Mike in the Turf Classic. Instead, they let him get away completely uncontested. I'm still sour about this, especially when the same thing happened in the American Turf on Friday. Pace and pace pressure seem to be something fading a bit in racing.

[jms62]

Originally Posted by Travis Stone

The Derby Gods frowned upon everyone who thought that someone would push Little Mike in the Turf Classic. Instead, they let him get away completely uncontested. I'm still sour about this, especially when the same thing happened in the American Turf on Friday. Pace and pace pressure seem to be something fading a bit in racing.

I have been festering over this myself but I have come to the conclusion that it is my fault that I didn't have Little Mike or Get Stormy on a backup ticket to guard against exactly what happened. Races are not run on paper. But I would not have gone 10 deep in the derby on my backup ticket like I did on my main so it is a moot point.

[clambeau]

Originally Posted by jms62

I have been festering over this myself but I have come to the conclusion that it is my fault that I didn't have Little Mike or Get Stormy on a backup ticket to guard against exactly what happened. Races are not run on paper. But I would not have gone 10 deep in the derby on my backup ticket like I did on my main so it is a moot point.

WOW....I was initially thinking about the Derby itself but you're so right...letting Little Mike waltz round the track like they did brought the loudest bitching in my house on Sat....The DERBY GODS have a BIG REACH on Derby Day even spilling over to the undercard

[Thunder Gulch]

Originally Posted by MaTH716

My answer would be Union Rags, terrible start, checked sharply on the backstretch and still ran 6th. I'm not saying he was gonna win, but with a clean trip he certainly could have made some noise.

Completely disagree, and I liked his chances, but Union Rags always finds his own trouble. He has not improved since last year, and he is just going to always have a difficult time navigating big fields of good horses. I may have felt differently if he made an impressive move, but he never really took off. Creative Cause, Went the Day Well, and Dullahan all had more actual moves when going as far or further navigating the field.

The Belmont may be the only important race I would think Union Rags has much of a chance at.

[Calzone Lord]

Union Rags was 7th -- he split 6th place finisher Liason and 8th place finisher Rousing Sermon.

All of his early trouble was fairly minor and overrated.

A lot of times horses who have trouble like that in race shapes like that run as well or even a little better than they would have with a clear trip.

Bird Town, when she upset the Kentucky Oaks for instance, got jammed back at the start and lost a lot of position. The trouble was a blessing in disguise because it got her trapped and forced her back behind a hot pace that she otherwise would have been attending.

[Calzone Lord]

Here's Bird Town's Kentucky Oaks -- she won at 18/1 odds after breaking very poorly from post #5 and getting shuffled way back.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGQ2CazIVBI

Bird Town was coming off back to back 7 furlong races. She set the pace in the Beaumont at Keeneland and was caught very late in her final prep. Her previous route try was a 4th place finish at Calder in the Fla Stallion Series race.

I think she was best in victory this day -- but the bad start and trouble saved her from being on the wrong end of the race shape.

[tiggerv]

Union Rags had 9F to recover and only needed a 102 Beyer to win with plenty of pace in front of him. As far as the Belmont, Dixie Union doesn't exactly scream 12F to me.

[blackthroatedwind]

I'm not a huge Union Rags fan, and wasn't interested in him Saturday ( I had to have one non-horrible opinion in the race ), but to ignore his trip is ridiculous. With all due respect to DrugS, his analogy to Bird Town is a poor one, as Union Rags had significant trouble, in a 20 horse field, that ( as Nick just pointed out ) put him in bad position to begin with, was exacerbated early in the running, and then even further complicated midway through the race. Whatever he might have done Saturday was completely compromised by his trip and it's silly to suggest otherwise.

[Calzone Lord]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

I'm not a huge Union Rags fan, and wasn't interested in him Saturday ( I had to have one non-horrible opinion in the race ), but to ignore his trip is ridiculous. With all due respect to DrugS, his analogy to Bird Town is a poor one, as Union Rags had significant trouble, in a 20 horse field, that ( as Nick just pointed out ) put him in bad position to begin with, was exacerbated early in the running, and then even further complicated midway through the race.

That's the thing -- his trip isn't being ignored.

The only actual running Union Rags did came in the part of the race where everyone else was falling over dead.

I will admit I've come to detest Union Rags popularity more and more with each race.

When Union Rags won the Champagne in markedly slower time than My Miss Aurillea did in the Frizette (same day and distance)...he was made to be a superstar. He was made even money against a fairly deep BC Juvie field and she was made 2/1 against an honestly slow and weak Juv Fillies field.

When Union Rags got beat in the BC Juvenile. Hansen was loose, but he set strong fractions and raced on what I thought was the worst part of the track. Union Rags, got a setup, and had a clear wide trip on a track where saving ground was no advantage. Hansen was truthfully the better horse that day IMO, and most everyone wanted to make Union Rags defeat seem so heroic.

When Union Rags came back and beat News Pending and a Pletcher cripple who missed a work right before the race -- in a days lone route race where no figure could be trusted -- it was hailed as a super performance by some. The Ragozin Sheets somehow have Union Rags win that day faster than Bodemeister's Arkansas Derby ... and they kept the variant straight for the Ark Derby. That was mysterious to me.

Union Rags is 2/5 for the Florida Derby. He doesn't get a clear wide trip and the excuses start flying again. The Florida Derby horses have all bombed. Take Charge Indy and El Padrino both bombed in the Ky Derby. News Pending was 10th in the Lexington Stakes behind All Squared Up. Reveron, an 80 Beyer type horse just missed in the Fla Derby with a perfect trip and came out of it injured. The brutally slow Neck N' Neck was beaten 4 and half lengths.

Now all of sudden you've got people saying Leperoux can't ride or Leperoux doesn't fit the horse. Everytime the horse gets a clear wide trip he's unjustly hailed as a super horse (narrow defeat to Hansen, wearing down News Pending in a FoY where Ragozin botched a figure) everytime he doesn't get a clear wide trip he gets excused for a variety of reasons. He makes so much of his own trouble.

[pointman]

The more that I have watched the race back, the more I think Went The Day Well ran a very good race. He doesn't need to be placed in the back of the pack to be effective go forward.

[Calzone Lord]

Originally Posted by pointman

The more that I have watched the race back, the more I think Went The Day Well ran a very good race. He doesn't need to be placed in the back of the pack to be effective go forward.

He clunked up.

He'd make a tremedously good bet against if he ran in the Belmont.

[pointman]

Originally Posted by Calzone Lord

He clunked up.

He'd make a tremedously good bet against if he ran in the Belmont.

I disagree. He came from far back of the pack and was the only one that had real run of those from far back. That run was not clunking.

[Calzone Lord]

Originally Posted by pointman

I disagree. He came from far back of the pack and was the only one that had real run of those from far back. That run was not clunking.

They ran the final quarter in 26.64 over a supersonic fast race-track.

That was like a 28 and change final quarter most years. Everyone was stopping late.

[slotdirt]

Originally Posted by Calzone Lord

He clunked up.

He'd make a tremedously good bet against if he ran in the Belmont.

I'm thinking he's going to be a tremendously good bet against in the Preakness, where Motion has him pointed next.