WI Governor Walker top aid under FBI investigation

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

Really? Which issue was that? Disagreeing with your politics? That's sort of the #1 cry of conservatives: when the facts show your governor to be a liar, dig in your heels and accuse the other side of "being wrong" and "refusing to admit they are wrong" - LOL

I dare you to talk only about politics here, and stop being nasty, insulting, personal. You can't do it, either.

The fact that you could not admit that you were wrong about justice prosser. You could not just admit that you were wrong. You had to continually attack him and find excuses on why he was not charged. You just couldn't admit that you were wrong. Plain and simple. There was nothing to the charges from day 1. You still believe in your mind that he is evil and should have been charged with a crime; however you are probably the only one on the planet that actually believes this. You might earn a little more respect around here by just admitting when your wrong or when Obama or the democrats are wrong. It is kind of similar to Nancy Pelosi's arguement about how unemployment benefits create jobs.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

The fact that you could not admit that you were wrong about justice prosser.

LOL - wrong. Excuse me, but I posted right up front in that thread, acknowledging that the Prosser result wasn't what I hoped for.

Nice try. But not true.

You still believe in your mind that he is evil and should have been charged with a crime; however you are probably the only one on the planet that actually believes this.

LOL - yes, I do, and no, I'm not the only one: the internal ethics charges with the law board are still pending. And it's pretty obvious the guy was involved in a physical altercation with another judge. And with a cameraman. And has a documented history of outbursts on the court.

If you think I'll ever post that Prosser is a man completely innocent of workplace violence, I'll never do that, because it would be an outright lie disproven by the facts.

You might earn more respect around here by not completely ignoring such things.

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

LOL - wrong. Excuse me, but I posted right up front in that thread, acknowledging that the Prosser result wasn't what I hoped for.

Nice try. But not true.



LOL - yes, I do, and no, I'm not the only one: the internal ethics charges with the law board are still pending. And it's pretty obvious the guy was involved in a physical altercation with another judge. And with a cameraman. And has a documented history of outbursts on the court.

If you think I'll ever post that Prosser is a man completely innocent of workplace violence, I'll never do that, because it would be an outright lie disproven by the facts.

You might earn more respect around here by not completely ignoring such things.

Again stating that the outcome wasn't what you hoped for and admitting you were wrong are 2 very different things. You just can't do it. If you had your way you would give the guy life in prison yet not only is he not guilty, but he was never even charged.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

Again stating that the outcome wasn't what you hoped for and admitting you were wrong are 2 very different things.

You didn't read the entire thread, I must assume?

Go away until you at least have some of the intellectual honesty you want in others.

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

You didn't read the entire thread, I must assume?

Go away until you at least have some of the intellectual honesty you want in others.

Wow. I post facts and you attack. I get it now. Carry on...

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

Wow. I post facts and you attack. I get it now. Carry on...

LOL - do you want me to post what I said from that thread, or you do want to slink away with a final name calling, hoping nobody will notice how factually false your attack is?

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Riot

LOL - oh, please. I wish you would post something about politics. You get the "three standard Riot responses" because that's exactly what you do: change the subject, start making personal comments, or outright lie about what was said.

Start with your post #22. You post one sentence about politics, then go right into personal crap. LOL - I dare you to post only about politics without snarky personal attacks. I doubt you can do it. You've never been able to do it to date.

this would be #2

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

this would be #2

Seriously, what is wrong with people like you? You constantly try and weasel out and try and change the context or some other bs but seriously what is wrong with you?

Outside of radical political operatives with mental deficencies, who in the world takes the positions that you take EVERY time? It's crazy.

Not to mention you constantly do exactly what you incessently whine about, changing the subject. You can't stand it when I do nothing but poke holes in your arguments. Face it, Obama isn't a disaster, most people are aware of that but you can't even concede that point.

I suppose if it wasn't for your inane takes and laughable responses the political section would be alot duller. So go ahead and continue to conflate your inability to talk politics, other than quoting opinions you agree with from the WSJ, with your scant ability to insult people. It's the best you can do.

[geeker2]

Originally Posted by Riot

Seriously, what is wrong with people like you? You constantly try and weasel out and try and change the context or some other bs but seriously what is wrong with you?

Outside of radical political operatives with mental deficencies, who in the world takes the positions that you take EVERY time? It's crazy.

Not to mention you constantly do exactly what you incessently whine about, changing the subject. You can't stand it when I do nothing but poke holes in your arguments. Face it, Obama isn't a disaster, most people are aware of that but you can't even concede that point.

I suppose if it wasn't for your inane takes and laughable responses the political section would be alot duller. So go ahead and continue to conflate your inability to talk politics, other than quoting opinions you agree with from the WSJ, with your scant ability to insult people. It's the best you can do.

It's official..you jumped the shark !

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

LOL - do you want me to post what I said from that thread, or you do want to slink away with a final name calling, hoping nobody will notice how factually false your attack is?

One question for you: did you believe or do you still believe Justice David prosser not only should have been charged in his so called attack on justice bradley but that he is in fact guilty?

Yes or no. I don't want a long drawn out answer

[Riot]

Originally Posted by geeker2

It's official..you jumped the shark !

Glad you made the list rules clear: It's okay if it's anti-Obama

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

One question for you: did you believe or do you still believe Justice David prosser not only should have been charged in his so called attack on justice bradley but that his is in fact guilty?

Yes or no. I don't want a long drawn out answer

I already asked, do you want me to post what I said from that thread, or you do want to slink away with a final name calling, hoping nobody will notice how factually false your attack is?

Seems you chose slinking away.

Then you come back changing the subject and trying to start a new argument . Geesh, how petty are you? Can't admit when you are wrong, huh?

I suggest you go read the very long thread on the subject that already exists. Where it has already been discussed in detail and answered. If you want to re-start discussion about Prosser, maybe you could use that very thread? And don't miss the parts where I talked about Prosser not being charged. Seems you missed that, the first five times.

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

I already asked, do you want me to post what I said from that thread, or you do want to slink away with a final name calling, hoping nobody will notice how factually false your attack is?

Seems you chose slinking away.

Then you come back changing the subject and trying to start a new argument . Geesh, how petty are you? Can't admit when you are wrong, huh?

I suggest you go read the very long thread on the subject that already exists. Where it has already been discussed in detail and answered. If you want to re-start discussion about Prosser, maybe you could use that very thread? And don't miss the parts where I talked about Prosser not being charged. Seems you missed that, the first five times.

I am not as smart as you. A simple yes or no would do. Can u do that?

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Riot

Seriously, what is wrong with people like you? You constantly try and weasel out and try and change the context or some other bs but seriously what is wrong with you?

Outside of radical political operatives with mental deficencies, who in the world takes the positions that you take EVERY time? It's crazy.

Not to mention you constantly do exactly what you incessently whine about, changing the subject. You can't stand it when I do nothing but poke holes in your arguments. Face it, Obama isn't a disaster, most people are aware of that but you can't even concede that point.

I suppose if it wasn't for your inane takes and laughable responses the political section would be alot duller. So go ahead and continue to conflate your inability to talk politics, other than quoting opinions you agree with from the WSJ, with your scant ability to insult people. It's the best you can do.

This one is harder to quantify. Elements of #2 and #3 with some plagiarism.

Though the "Obama isn't a disaster" comment brings questions of lucidity into the equation

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Riot

Glad you made the list rules clear: It's okay if it's anti-Obama

So if I point out that the Indianapolis Colts suck does that mean I am anti-Colts? Or just stating the obvious?

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

I am not as smart as you. A simple yes or no would do. Can u do that?

And I'm not as empty-headed and forgetful as you. The thread you started is convenient, go read it. And again, be sure to post the part where you were wrong

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Riot

I already asked, do you want me to post what I said from that thread, or you do want to slink away with a final name calling, hoping nobody will notice how factually false your attack is?

Seems you chose slinking away.

Then you come back changing the subject and trying to start a new argument . Geesh, how petty are you? Can't admit when you are wrong, huh?

I suggest you go read the very long thread on the subject that already exists. Where it has already been discussed in detail and answered. If you want to re-start discussion about Prosser, maybe you could use that very thread? And don't miss the parts where I talked about Prosser not being charged. Seems you missed that, the first five times.

This is a long yes or no.

p.s.-I dont see any name calling in Wiphans question

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

This is a long yes or no.

p.s.-I dont see any name calling in Wiphans question

Wiphan accused me of something that isn't true. Wiphan knows that. That's why he's changed the subject, and is trying to distract and start a new fight

Wiphan - the thread where this was discussed in detail is readily available. If you want to know what I think of Prosser not being charged, I suggest you go re-read the pages and pages of it where it's been previously discussed. Be sure you read the whole thing, not just the parts you want to

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by Riot

I already asked, do you want me to post what I said from that thread, or you do want to slink away with a final name calling, hoping nobody will notice how factually false your attack is?

Seems you chose slinking away.

Then you come back changing the subject and trying to start a new argument . Geesh, how petty are you? Can't admit when you are wrong, huh?

I suggest you go read the very long thread on the subject that already exists. Where it has already been discussed in detail and answered. If you want to re-start discussion about Prosser, maybe you could use that very thread? And don't miss the parts where I talked about Prosser not being charged. Seems you missed that, the first five times.

They are right Republicans and they are perfect. Haven't you read Dino's in depth analysis, Lord007 objective reasoning?

[Riot]

Originally Posted by GBBob

They are right Republicans and they are perfect. Haven't you read Dino's in depth analysis, Lord007 objective reasoning?

Thanks for the backup, but be careful, the shot's still flying. Don't get an accidental hit!