WI Governor Walker top aid under FBI investigation

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

LOL - wrong. Excuse me, but I posted right up front in that thread, acknowledging that the Prosser result wasn't what I hoped for.

Nice try. But not true.



LOL - yes, I do, and no, I'm not the only one: the internal ethics charges with the law board are still pending. And it's pretty obvious the guy was involved in a physical altercation with another judge. And with a cameraman. And has a documented history of outbursts on the court.

If you think I'll ever post that Prosser is a man completely innocent of workplace violence, I'll never do that, because it would be an outright lie disproven by the facts.

You might earn more respect around here by not completely ignoring such things.

Again stating that the outcome wasn't what you hoped for and admitting you were wrong are 2 very different things. You just can't do it. If you had your way you would give the guy life in prison yet not only is he not guilty, but he was never even charged.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

Again stating that the outcome wasn't what you hoped for and admitting you were wrong are 2 very different things.

You didn't read the entire thread, I must assume?

Go away until you at least have some of the intellectual honesty you want in others.

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

You didn't read the entire thread, I must assume?

Go away until you at least have some of the intellectual honesty you want in others.

Wow. I post facts and you attack. I get it now. Carry on...

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

Wow. I post facts and you attack. I get it now. Carry on...

LOL - do you want me to post what I said from that thread, or you do want to slink away with a final name calling, hoping nobody will notice how factually false your attack is?

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

LOL - do you want me to post what I said from that thread, or you do want to slink away with a final name calling, hoping nobody will notice how factually false your attack is?

One question for you: did you believe or do you still believe Justice David prosser not only should have been charged in his so called attack on justice bradley but that he is in fact guilty?

Yes or no. I don't want a long drawn out answer

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

One question for you: did you believe or do you still believe Justice David prosser not only should have been charged in his so called attack on justice bradley but that his is in fact guilty?

Yes or no. I don't want a long drawn out answer

I already asked, do you want me to post what I said from that thread, or you do want to slink away with a final name calling, hoping nobody will notice how factually false your attack is?

Seems you chose slinking away.

Then you come back changing the subject and trying to start a new argument . Geesh, how petty are you? Can't admit when you are wrong, huh?

I suggest you go read the very long thread on the subject that already exists. Where it has already been discussed in detail and answered. If you want to re-start discussion about Prosser, maybe you could use that very thread? And don't miss the parts where I talked about Prosser not being charged. Seems you missed that, the first five times.

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

I already asked, do you want me to post what I said from that thread, or you do want to slink away with a final name calling, hoping nobody will notice how factually false your attack is?

Seems you chose slinking away.

Then you come back changing the subject and trying to start a new argument . Geesh, how petty are you? Can't admit when you are wrong, huh?

I suggest you go read the very long thread on the subject that already exists. Where it has already been discussed in detail and answered. If you want to re-start discussion about Prosser, maybe you could use that very thread? And don't miss the parts where I talked about Prosser not being charged. Seems you missed that, the first five times.

I am not as smart as you. A simple yes or no would do. Can u do that?

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Riot

I already asked, do you want me to post what I said from that thread, or you do want to slink away with a final name calling, hoping nobody will notice how factually false your attack is?

Seems you chose slinking away.

Then you come back changing the subject and trying to start a new argument . Geesh, how petty are you? Can't admit when you are wrong, huh?

I suggest you go read the very long thread on the subject that already exists. Where it has already been discussed in detail and answered. If you want to re-start discussion about Prosser, maybe you could use that very thread? And don't miss the parts where I talked about Prosser not being charged. Seems you missed that, the first five times.

This is a long yes or no.

p.s.-I dont see any name calling in Wiphans question

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by Riot

I already asked, do you want me to post what I said from that thread, or you do want to slink away with a final name calling, hoping nobody will notice how factually false your attack is?

Seems you chose slinking away.

Then you come back changing the subject and trying to start a new argument . Geesh, how petty are you? Can't admit when you are wrong, huh?

I suggest you go read the very long thread on the subject that already exists. Where it has already been discussed in detail and answered. If you want to re-start discussion about Prosser, maybe you could use that very thread? And don't miss the parts where I talked about Prosser not being charged. Seems you missed that, the first five times.

They are right Republicans and they are perfect. Haven't you read Dino's in depth analysis, Lord007 objective reasoning?