It was never gonna work!

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

i'd rather make infrequent but sensible posts than constantly spam politics/society with nonsense.

just to be clear, that doesn't mean i can never make frequent posts.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

i'd rather make infrequent but sensible posts than constantly spam politics/society with nonsense.

But it's fun. C'mon, watching politics is fun! Especially when Hannity "gets ahold of alleged Pre-Speech talking points" and goes bat-shait ballistic before the big show tonight

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

i'd rather make infrequent but sensible posts than constantly spam politics/society with nonsense.

Dont talk to Riot like that!

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

I think Obama could be okay with a Republican congress.

I'm sure he's as frustrated with Pelosi & company as we all are (republicans and democrats together).

A Republican congress would keep him in check with the amount of money being spent.. and I would hope the Republican congress would work with the President on some of his reasonable idea's.

It worked out okay with Clinton.. Though Bush & Dem led congress was a disaster. Bush with Republican congress was a disaster. So far Obama with Dem Congress has been a disaster.

I want Obama to do well.. I want this COUNTRY to do well.. I just dont agree with most of President Obama's idea's and plans. If he gets a R Congress and moves more to the center, I'll be much happier.

Good points. I agree alot of the drama can be laid at Pelosi and Reid's door. Not a fan.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

It's only to balance the abject adoration that you and others and the MSM have for this guy.

it doesn't balance it. most of us know that most people aren't always right, or always wrong. only cheering and only bashing are equally annoying.

[miraja2]

Originally Posted by miraja2

The Washington Times is nothing if not the Glenn Beck of newspapers, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised, but just out of curiosity, could someone explain this line in the editorial to me:

"The most striking slump occurred with the white middle class, which bears the brunt of Mr. Obama's wildly irresponsible fiscal policies."

My question is - Which of Obama's "fiscal policies" negatively affect the "white middle class" specifically?

Still waiting for an answer.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by miraja2

Still waiting for an answer.

They'll retract tomorrow and replace with 'single, healthy, middle-class, with no children spanning all races who are here legally' Actually the, 'single, healthy upper-class with no children spanning all races who are here legally' will get screwed the worst but who cares about them?

[2Hot4TV]

Originally Posted by Riot

But it's fun. C'mon, watching politics is fun! Especially when Hannity "gets ahold of alleged Pre-Speech talking points" and goes bat-shait ballistic before the big show tonight

Kind of like smoking CRACK! No thanks I have more productive things to do.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by Riot

Well, that's your personal circle of friends. Here in the heart of central Kentucky Mitch McConnell Republicanism, the most common opinion I run into is that Obama is the Kenyan Muslim Communist Negro AntiChrist who has ruined our country forever.

newblackpanthers.jpg