National Presidential Election contest thread

Almost as funny as Carlton Banks having the right to kill any of us without a trial.

But lets concern ourselves with the candidate's bad back, you disingenuous pr.ick.

[jms62]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Almost as funny as Carlton Banks having the right to kill any of us without a trial.

But lets concern ourselves with the candidate's bad back, you disingenuous pr.ick.

No I'd rather concern myself with the **** rasing my taxes while lowering his own. I'd rather concern myself with voting against someone who made hundreds of millions firing people and shipping their jobs overseas who now is trying to sell us that he is a job creator. Spineless is a metaphor for the fact that he will say whatever it ****ing takes to get out of the moment and win the crowd that he is talking to that second. I hate the ****ing man with the white hot intensity of 1000 suns. I have no horse in this race as I am a Ron Paul guy but given the choice of voting for someone who I know is going to **** me I will caste my vote against Romney.

So basically you just admitted to being a gullible idiot.

You do know that Obama hasn't improved the jobs situation right? Or I guess you just think part time minimum wage jobs are real jobs?

One thing I do know is they're basically the same albeit one important factor...one is a proven businessman who was successful. He was successful due to taking advantages of FTA's like NAFTA that BILL GOD DAMN CLINTON SIGNED F.UCKFACE

Sorry but navy seals dying is f.ucking real, b.itch. Your assumption that he'll destroy jobs is just that. Anything is better than what we've had to endure this past 4 years.

Talk about spineless...to me that's letting a woman take the blame for Benghazi.

You accept tyranny. Done with you, son.

[jms62]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

So basically you just admitted to being a gullible idiot.

You do know that Obama hasn't improved the jobs situation right? Or I guess you just think part time minimum wage jobs are real jobs?

One thing I do know is they're basically the same albeit one important factor...one is a proven businessman who was successful. He was successful due to taking advantages of FTA's like NAFTA that BILL GOD DAMN CLINTON SIGNED F.UCKFACE

Sorry but navy seals dying is f.ucking real, b.itch. Your assumption that he'll destroy jobs is just that. Anything is better than what we've had to endure this past 4 years.

Talk about spineless...to me that's letting a woman take the blame for Benghazi.

You accept tyranny. Done with you, son.

Successful Businessman BUILD BUSINESS. Leveraged Buyouts are a DESTRUCTIVE business practice. He basically is using borrowed money to pay himself, load the company with debt and then ****ing disappear on his yacht with the hunderds of ****ing millions he siphoned off. You call him a ****ing businessman and I call him a ****ing lamprey eel sucking the financial blood from the host.

Originally Posted by jms62

Successful Businessman BUILD BUSINESS. Leveraged Buyouts are a DESTRUCTIVE business practice. He basically is using borrowed money to pay himself, load the company with debt and then ****ing disappear on his yacht with the hunderds of ****ing millions he siphoned off. You call him a ****ing businessman and I call him a ****ing lamprey eel sucking the financial blood from the host.

No successful businessman make money. Period. His business built personal wealth and obviously you have a problem with a man who is free to do what he did because BILL CLINTON (through H.W. Bush) signed NAFTA and opened the floodgates.

It's called a good business decision in the environment. You play the game with what you're given and our politicians gave him the power.

And you know why? The microcosm? Smart people were busy looking at the appearance of a candidate...election after election.

So pardon me if I call you out for it.

[jms62]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

No successful businessman make money. Period. His business built personal wealth and obviously you have a problem with a man who is free to do what he did because BILL CLINTON (through H.W. Bush) signed NAFTA and opened the floodgates.

It's called a good business decision in the environment. You play the game with what you're given and our politicians gave him the power.

And you know why? The microcosm? Smart people were busy looking at the appearance of a candidate...election after election.

So pardon me if I call you out for it.

His business makes him rich while it devastates the economy long term. He is strip mining the economy for his short term gain. The wages for those jobs that are forever gone are some companies revenues that are no longer there. Clinton is a **** for signing NAFTA and signing the repeal of Glass-Stegal and is the most overrated president of our time. We are paying for his sins. It is no ****ing secret that Romney will raise taxes on the middle class. You hate Obama so much that you will vote against yourself?

Originally Posted by jms62

His business makes him rich while it devastates the economy long term. He is strip mining the economy for his short term gain. The wages for those jobs that are forever gone are some companies revenues that are no longer there. Clinton is a **** for signing NAFTA and signing the repeal of Glass-Stegal and is the most overrated president of our time. We are paying for his sins. It is no ****ing secret that Romney will raise taxes on the middle class. You hate Obama so much that you will vote against yourself?

I didn't vote.

My income isn't affected much either way, jms. And I'm quite o.k. with adapting to change when needed...I just know what I'm getting with Romney.

With Obama I'm not as certain. So yes I prefer Romney and quite frankly if Ron Paul was President now and did this bad I would feel the same.

I go by record. Obama's is atrocious. And he's highly unlikeable. He's an ******* that doesn't know he's an *******.

Romney is well aware that he's an *******...therefore he's a prick. Pricks usually don't kiss commies asses on open mic.

Prick wins.