Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-04-2012, 03:27 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles View Post
In other words, you won't address any of the reasonable points I made,
No. I have attempted multiple times on this board to address, in a reasonable and honest fashion, your factual errors about what lasix can and cannot do.

I have honestly quoted to you the proven, unquestionable science. I have tried to give you the real facts.

You have always simply ignored it or dismissed it out of hand as you did above.

You can't refute the science, it's what it is. The facts matter. The truth matters. That isn't my opinion, it's just the truth. My opinion is formed by the truth.

You're is formed in your imagination.

You have always, and continue to, ignore discussing the issue of lasix from a factual scientific basis.

You deny proven science exists. You simply, purposely ignore whatever doesn't fit your opinion.

Thus "debating" you on lasix is futile, and a colossal waste of time, because you don't ever debate honestly from the basis of truthful scientific fact about the drug.

Quote:
you'll just repeat the same mantra ad nauseum.
Yes, you do.

Quote:
It is true, I'm no vet, but I know horsesh!t when I see it. I will say it is comical that I, and others, get chastised because we aren't vets but give opinions, but a bunch of vets think they know how to measure horse speed.
You get "chastised" because you confuse "opinion" with "factual reality" and "science"

When a horse is running on a high-speed treadmill set at 16 meters/second squared - yeah. We "do" know how to measure speed. And yeah - we know how to do those "statistics" things when examining 27,000+ horses that race in Australia, North and South America, and South Africa, too.

Dismissing the hard, proven science out of hand - not any "new" information, mind you, but studies whose facts have been independently verified and repeated over and over by scientists in multiple disciplines - is what make the "anti-lasix" argument folks a complete loser.

You might as well embrace creationism to further your arguments about lasix. It's the same thing as your blatant dismissal of all proven science.

I repeat: Thus "debating" you on lasix is futile, and a colossal waste of time, because you don't ever debate honestly from the basis of truthful scientific fact about the drug.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-04-2012, 03:31 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
When a horse is racing on a high-speed treadmill set at 16 meters/second squared - yeah. We "do" know how to measure speed.
Comical. When horses start racing on treadmills, maybe that will have some merit. I can't think of a dumber way to try to measure horse speed. You measure speed in races, not on a treadmill or even during workouts. If that worked, every winning first time starter would pay $2.20.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-04-2012, 03:37 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles View Post
Comical. When horses start racing on treadmills, maybe that will have some merit. I can't think of a dumber way to try to measure horse speed. You measure speed in races, not on a treadmill or even during workouts. If that worked, every winning first time starter would pay $2.20.
Yeah, just ignore those 27,000 other horses I mentioned.

Science - it screw up your opinions. Too bad for you.

But the most hilarious thing is, in your silly superficial, shallow arguments about "speed" right now, you completely fail to realize how I've always posted the science that shows horses improve 3 - 5.5 lengths on lasix. Including in this thread. Including the post you dismissed as "yada, yada, yada'

Duh.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-04-2012, 03:48 PM
Dahoss Dahoss is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 10,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
But the most hilarious thing is, in your silly superficial, shallow arguments about "speed" right now, you completely fail to realize how I've always posted the science that shows horses improve 3 - 5.5 lengths on lasix.
So it is a performance enhancer?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-04-2012, 05:42 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahoss View Post
So it is a performance enhancer?
You might rather re-read the multiple places where I have already answered that in detail rather than your simplistic statement - good job!
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-04-2012, 09:14 PM
Dahoss Dahoss is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 10,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
You might rather re-read the multiple places where I have already answered that in detail rather than your simplistic statement - good job!
Since you keep talking in circles I thought keeping it simple might help.

It hasn't.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-04-2012, 09:33 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahoss View Post
Since you keep talking in circles I thought keeping it simple might help.

It hasn't.
It is all she ever does. It would explain a lot if she lived in a crop field.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-05-2012, 12:07 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahoss View Post
Since you keep talking in circles I thought keeping it simple might help.

It hasn't.
You know that's not true, nor is it fair.

Especially as I've tried to answer your questions in good faith, and it appears you deliberately want to ignore that.

Once again, I tried to keep it very simple for you pages ago:

Virtually all TB race horses suffer EIPH.
Suffering EIPH impedes performance.
Lasix attenuates EIPH very successfully.
Horses that don't suffer EIPH - because they have received a shot of lasix - regain their performance level.
Yes, lasix improves performance in horses suffering EIPH, because they are no longer suffering EIPH.
If you give a performance horse not suffering EIPH lasix, does their performance improve?
No. Not at all. No, lasix is not a stand-alone performance-enhancer.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-04-2012, 06:17 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahoss View Post
So it is a performance enhancer?
Of course it is, otherwise those horses that don't get Lasix, but get some other form of treatment to stop bleeding, would also improve 3 to 5 lengths. But, they don't.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-04-2012, 06:22 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles View Post
Of course it is, otherwise those horses that don't get Lasix, but get some other form of treatment to stop bleeding, would also improve 3 to 5 lengths. But, they don't.
Yes. Furosemide stops EIPH. Other things also help stop EIPH. Currently allowable adjuncts do not reliably work to stop EIPH.

The improvement of return to performance - a horse being able to perform again at 100%, because the horse is not bleeding into their lung from EIPH and suffocating - is about the same for those things that work successfully to stop EIPH.

Science is amazing. Medicine is amazing. How about that?
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.