Wisconsin Recall

[bigrun]

Originally Posted by Riot

Yes, I said you'd have to, you know, actually follow the links in the articles yourself. Here, because you were too stupid to figure out how to click in the article above, is a direct link to what you want.

Now, you will have to move your hand over to your mouse, and click on this. And read it.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...f+&hl=en&gl=us

not nice

[Riot]

Originally Posted by bigrun

not nice

Hey, I'm just agreeing with Wiphan. Wiphan was the one that said he was an idiot.

After all, I have posted, multiple times, the very document he wanted to see. He just, you know, keeps saying he can't "see" it.

Sounds pretty stupid to me.

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

Hey, I'm just agreeing with Wiphan. Wiphan was the one that said he was an idiot.

After all, I have posted, multiple times, the very document he wanted to see. He just, you know, keeps saying he can't "see" it.

Sounds pretty stupid to me.

I still don't see a single email from Scott Walker released or published in any of the information.

I voted for Scott Walker. You called all of the people that voted for him an idiot thus I along with 53% of the people that voted for Scott Walker for again are idiots according to you.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

I still don't see a single email from Scott Walker released or published in any of the information.

Yeah. They probably have it wrong in the copy of the actual criminal complaint I gave you the link to.

I said new documents show Walker lied. He didn't aid the criminal complaint, he stalled it. You said you wanted proof. I gave you the link to the actual legal court documents.

Keep denying it exists.

I voted for Scott Walker. You called all of the people that voted for him an idiot thus I along with 53% of the people that voted for Scott Walker for again are idiots according to you.

Yes. I do think the 53% of people that voted for the clearly lying, under-investigation Scott Walker are idiots.

Here's one reason why: you might contact the Journal-Sentinel, and tell them that you think their story about Scott Walker lying about asking for the criminal investigation, rather actually blocking the criminal investigation, and the copies of the proof they published with the story (that you have been given the link to, but continue to deny it exists), is wrong.

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

Yeah. They probably have it wrong in the copy of the actual criminal complaint I gave you the link to.

I said new documents show Walker lied. He didn't aid the criminal complaint, he stalled it. You said you wanted proof. I gave you the link to the actual legal court documents.

Keep denying it exists.



Yes. I do think the 53% of people that voted for the clearly lying, under-investigation Scott Walker are idiots.

Here's one reason why: you might contact the Journal-Sentinel, and tell them that you think their story about Scott Walker lying about asking for the criminal investigation, rather actually blocking the criminal investigation, and the copies of the proof they published with the story (that you have been given the link to, but continue to deny it exists), is wrong.

Fortunately you are in the minority

You specifically stated that there were released published emails from Scott Walker's office yet you can not produce a single one. Please provide just 1 email

[wiphan]

What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof.

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by wiphan

What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof.

Are you suggesting it is not in there? I read the entire thing and you sir are correct.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

Fortunately you are in the minority

You specifically stated that there were released published emails from Scott Walker's office yet you can not produce a single one. Please provide just 1 email

They are the attachments to the court documents you are ignoring the existence of.

Let's go back:

Riot says that it turns out Scott Walker lied. He did not ask for the criminal investigation, Walker stonewalled it.
Wiphan says, "Give me proof" that Scott Walker lied, and did not ask for the criminal investigation, but stonewalled it.
Riot provides the proof - in the form of the newspaper article outlining it, with the attachment of the original court complaint proving it.

Wiphan and Clip Clop pretend it doesn't exist.

Wiphan says, "Walker called for the John Doe investigation. That is a fact". No, Wiphan. Scott Walker lied about that, and the proof is right in front of your eyes.

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by Riot

They are the attachments to the court documents you are ignoring the existence of.

Let's go back:

Riot says that it turns out Scott Walker lied. He did not ask for the criminal investigation, Walker stonewalled it.
Wiphan says, "Give me proof" that Scott Walker lied, and did not ask for the criminal investigation, but stonewalled it.
Riot provides the proof - in the form of the newspaper article outlining it, with the attachment of the original court complaint proving it.

Wiphan and Clip Clop pretend it doesn't exist.

Wiphan says, "Walker called for the John Doe investigation. That is a fact". No, Wiphan. Scott Walker lied about that, and the proof is right in front of your eyes.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...f+&hl=en&gl=us

Copy and paste from this document an email please.