|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
06-05-2012, 01:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
I really am disapointed with myself. I'm totally buying into Union Rags. The power house work article is making me more comfortable. If he's not on or near lead then ill really be stunned.
|
|
#2
06-05-2012, 02:10 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
06-05-2012, 03:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not likely.
I have lots of issues.
|
|
#5
06-05-2012, 08:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
ive bet against rags all year but i think this is his race to lose
he has a race over and the trail must have taken its toll on IHA if he runs anything close to the juvenile color him gone thast said his two yo campaign towers over anything on his 3yo resume jockey change jr's home track and crowd the brief freshening i see shades of easy goer i am using rags on top and will use IHA as a saver for my drink and food orders
|
|
#6
06-05-2012, 08:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
06-05-2012, 08:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was looking at my autographed Michael Matz pancake on head painting this morning.
The silence told me 3rd.
|
|
#8
06-05-2012, 09:00 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think recent history shows that fresher horses run better at Belmont. I don't believe we've had a horse who ran in the Preakness win the Belmont since 2005. And before that, you have to go back to Point Given in 2001 to find a Belmont winner who even ran in the Preakness.
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs."
|
|
#9
06-05-2012, 05:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
 speaking of four years ago, is that when you had the bet vs dahoss that you lost? not sure the exact time frame....
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln
|
|
#10
06-05-2012, 06:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
Hybrid Mode
