Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-12-2012, 11:44 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
That has been done. More than once. Those studies have existed for many years now.

They've even been quoted in the threads about lasix you write in, but apparently don't read.
I do read, and I found the results ambiguous. How could they be anything else when different conclusions are reached?

I also would submit that the testing methods were woefully flawed. The performance measurements were obviously designed by people that knew little about actual racing and how to measure performance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-12-2012, 11:54 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles View Post
I do read, and I found the results ambiguous.
Really? Which studies specifically have you found "ambiguous"?

Quote:
How could they be anything else when different conclusions are reached?
Well, you're suffering a confusion common to people who know nothing about science, and less than nothing about critical, objective thinking.

Quote:
I also would submit that the testing methods were woefully flawed. The performance measurements were obviously designed by people that knew little about actual racing and how to measure performance.
And again: list which studies you are calling "flawed", and which "measurements" you think are inadequate. Be specific.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-12-2012, 11:56 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Really? Which studies specifically have you found "ambiguous"?



Well, you're suffering a confusion common to people who know nothing about science, and less than nothing about critical, objective thinking.



And again: list which studies you are calling "flawed", and which "measurements" you think are inadequate. Be specific.
I'm not playing your games.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-13-2012, 12:01 AM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles View Post
I'm not playing your games.
Because you don't have a clue about lasix or studies or methods or peer review and scientific quality. You're only good at throwing out mindless and ignorant accusations and invented crap about trainers and veterinarians. You know what you know, and dammit, you're not gonna let any facts or reality change your mind.

Your games are beyond tiresome. It's not about you. It's about the horses.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-13-2012, 12:04 AM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
It's about the horses.
Yeah, sure it is. I've already addressed this and you went off on a ridiculous, unfounded rant.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.