France-same shooter

Originally Posted by jms62

Nascar?

His distant cousin Formula One.

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

His distant cousin Formula One.

Formula UH

[dellinger63]

Call me shocked!

Islam strikes again.

"I have brought the Jewish and Muslim communities together to show that terrorism will not manage to break our nation's feeling of community," Sarkozy said after meeting community leaders. "We must stand together. We must not cede to discrimination or vengeance."

I'm not sure why Sarozy spoke to the Jewish community on this.

IMO Similar to bringing an abused wife together with her abuser in the hope of preserving the abusive marriage.

There is no room on this earth for radical Islamists and they need to be dealt with. Better now than later. A culture who considers honor killings to be valid and treating your wife as you would your dog may be beyond help.

In the name of women and children all over the world, please stop these maniacs.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/s...,7933232.story

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Call me shocked!

Islam strikes again.


I'm not sure why Sarozy spoke to the Jewish community on this.

IMO Similar to bringing an abused wife together with her abuser in the hope of preserving the abusive marriage.

There is no room on this earth for radical Islamists and they need to be dealt with. Better now than later. A culture who considers honor killings to be valid and treating your wife as you would your dog may be beyond help.

In the name of women and children all over the world, please stop these maniacs.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/s...,7933232.story

no dell...al qaeda struck again. and sarkozy probably brought together the jewish community since they're always a target, and they just had four killed yesterday by a terrorist-the same guy who shot some french soldiers of north african origin-you think he asked what religion they were before killing them? he was only concerned with the fact they were french soldiers, and the shooter was targetting them because he didn't like that france has a presence in the middle east.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a...re_wrong_.html


the White House released its National Security Strategy. The document declared:

'The United States is waging a global campaign against al-Qa’ida and its terrorist affiliates. To disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qa’ida and its affiliates, we are pursuing a strategy that … denies al-Qa’ida safe haven, and builds positive partnerships with Muslim communities around the world. … We will always seek to delegitimize the use of terrorism and to isolate those who carry it out. Yet this is not a global war against a tactic—terrorism—or a religion—Islam. We are at war with a specific network, al-Qa’ida, and its terrorist affiliates who support efforts to attack the United States, our allies, and partners.'

and further down:

Bin Laden’s biggest concern was al-Qaeda’s media image among Muslims. He worried that it was so tarnished that, in a draft letter … he argued that the organization should find a new name. The al-Qaeda brand had become a problem, bin Laden explained, because Obama administration officials “have largely stopped using the phrase ‘the war on terror’ in the context of not wanting to provoke Muslims,” and instead promoted a war against al-Qaeda. The organization’s full name was “Qaeda al-Jihad,” bin Laden noted, but in its shorthand version, “this name reduces the feeling of Muslims that we belong to them.” … Bin Laden ruminated about “mistakes” and “miscalculations” by affiliates in Iraq and elsewhere that had killed Muslims, even in mosques. He told Atiyah to warn every emir, or regional leader, to avoid these “unnecessary civilian casualties,” which were hurting the organization. “Making these mistakes is a great issue,” he stressed, arguing that spilling “Muslim blood” had resulted in “the alienation of most of the nation [of Islam] from the [Mujaheddin].”

Obama and Brennan were right. So was George W. Bush in his steadfast refusal to blame Islam for 9/11. Bin Laden wanted a religious war. Bush and Obama refused to let him have it. At the end of his life, isolated by left-wing drone strikes and marked for death by PC commandos, this was Bin Laden’s chief lament.

[jms62]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Call me shocked!

Islam strikes again.



I'm not sure why Sarozy spoke to the Jewish community on this.

IMO Similar to bringing an abused wife together with her abuser in the hope of preserving the abusive marriage.

There is no room on this earth for radical Islamists and they need to be dealt with. Better now than later. A culture who considers honor killings to be valid and treating your wife as you would your dog may be beyond help.

In the name of women and children all over the world, please stop these maniacs.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/s...,7933232.story

What we really need is Rick Santourm in charge. We need to do the Crusades in 21st century style. Radical Islam or Christianity is the same nonsense; talking to the invisible man in the sky and making the charlatans leading the effort obscenely wealthy.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by jms62

What we really need is Rick Santourm in charge. We need to do the Crusades in 21st century style. Radical Islam or Christianity is the same nonsense; talking to the invisible man in the sky and making the charlatans leading the effort obscenely wealthy.

Except Christians evolved beyond the Crusades and are no longer killing in the name of the invisible man. Now, like Santorum the radical ones are trying to preserve life, at any cost, over-ruling individual choice and they're considered anti-women.

When will the Radical Islamists follow suit?

And when will the less radical Muslims begin to respect womens' rights or women for that matter, much less individual choice.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Except Christians evolved beyond the Crusades and are no longer killing in the name of the invisible man. Now, like Santorum the radical ones are trying to preserve life, at any cost, over-ruling individual choice and they're considered anti-women.

When will the Radical Islamists follow suit?

And when will the less radical Muslims begin to respect womens' rights or women for that matter, much less individual choice.

wait...so you mention that a group of people is pro-life, but anti-women..and then ask when muslims will progress to that point? lol only to you would that make sense.

again, not sure why you persist in making this a religious issue. the fact remains that al qaeda kills more muslims than any other group, but you're still trying to make it a muslim issue, rather than a terrorist issue. the guy in france joined al qaeda to get help with killing, not to get help as a muslim. he wanted to kill jews and soldiers, not try to convert people.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Danzig

wait...so you mention that a group of people is pro-life, but anti-women..and then ask when muslims will progress to that point? lol only to you would that make sense..

No I mentioned a group that was pro-life and was PERCEIVED as anti-woman.

Is Al qaeda the only ones killing their wives and daughters to preserve honor? Is it only them who don't allow women to socialize with the opposite sex? Is it only al qaeda women that can't drive, go to college and marry who they want? And for Allah's sake what about the gay muslims? Or are there none as preached by the whacko Pres of Iran? What about a muslim woman who wants an abortion, a career or marry outside of her religion.

Comparing Islam as a whole to Christianity is like comparing Manson to the 14-year old who got caught shoplifting.

[jms62]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Except Christians evolved beyond the Crusades and are no longer killing in the name of the invisible man. Now, like Santorum the radical ones are trying to preserve life, at any cost, over-ruling individual choice and they're considered anti-women.

When will the Radical Islamists follow suit?

And when will the less radical Muslims begin to respect womens' rights or women for that matter, much less individual choice.

I'm sure no Klansman consider themselves "Good Christians"

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by jms62

I'm sure no Klansman consider themselves "Good Christians"

When was the last Klan killing?

Admittedly they are the al qaeda of the Christian religion yet mainly because of Christians, are no longer much of a threat

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Except Christians evolved beyond the Crusades and are no longer killing in the name of the invisible man. Now, like Santorum the radical ones are trying to preserve life, at any cost, over-ruling individual choice and they're considered anti-women.

When will the Radical Islamists follow suit?

And when will the less radical Muslims begin to respect womens' rights or women for that matter, much less individual choice.

Rick Santorum is such an awesome christian. He loves those alive babies.. unless you are born a woman, or gay.. or god forbid born into a spanish speaking family.

He gives christians SUCH a good name. I think I'll go to bible study tonight.