![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Are you serious the judge was bias and should have excused himself from the case. He signed the recall the first day and is clearly bias to walker. Another attorney in the article said the judge should have excused himself. You tell me if that isn't being bias. What is really sad, is showing an id is not a bad thing. Every person does it everyday. I've worked at a bar, and no matter what your age you have to show a picture id to get in the bar! Its not that big of a deal and it is the right thing! I can't wait til the recall vote and walker wins by a landslide! Then all you train lovers can shut up!
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
And further, that the demonstrable non-adherence to Wisconsin Voting Law was based upon bias? What ridiculous, non-reality based accusations. This isn't a effing joke. These are serious accusations against a judge, his life, his work. The laughable thing is that, for people to make those accusations, reveals that that is the way they, themselves, would probably act. The trial is April 16th. A recusal may be asked for at that time.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |