![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
i know what you mean about likes and dislikes. i personally don't like to see high withers on a horse...another thing i don't like is when the rear is higher than the withers-i've seen horses were their hind end was substantially higher. not sure if either has anything to do with running ability-just a personal quirk of mine. i like a smooth transition from neck to withers and then to the rear-with the withers and high point of the back end on level.
or is that just plain wrong?? i see bloodhorse has a conformation video for sale....anyone buy it yet? is it a good one? stonesider is one i like: http://www.bloodhorse.com/stallion-r...50&origin=link eskenderaya is an example of a horse with a higher rear than withers http://www.bloodhorse.com/stallion-r...?refno=8000094 now, here's hard spun: http://www.bloodhorse.com/stallion-r...63&origin=link thoughts? like the looks of corinthian: http://www.bloodhorse.com/stallion-r...35&origin=link but of course you can't get a great feel for the legs, since you can't get a head on and from behind view....
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |