Timmy Ice Tebow...

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

KC can still turn it on and win games.

.

Originally Posted by Dahoss

The Chiefs got beat 37-10 yesterday by the Jets and the Dolphins beat the Chiefs 31-3 this year when they played. The Chiefs have lost 5 of 6 and their lone win during this span is over....wait for it....the Bears who were playing without Cutler and Forte got hurt in the first quarter.

But they can still turn it on and win games? My competition arguments might be stupid to you, but arguing about something you know very little about seems kind of stupid to me.

.

ask the previously undefeated Packers

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

ask the previously undefeated Packers

I figured this was coming. I stick by what I said. All of it.

[Dahoss]

For the record, John Skelton is now 5-1 as a starter for the Cardinals. No one cares (and rightfully so) but it is interesting to see the total lack of coverage it has gotten. His team is winning, not him.

Hoss you're too smart not to see why Tebow is dominating coverage. Ratings. Hardcore fans might care about Skelton but until he turns into a virgin and puts a halo on his head he'll never get equal airtime.

It has always been this way and Tebow isn't going to change it.

[3kings]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

For the record, John Skelton is now 5-1 as a starter for the Cardinals. No one cares (and rightfully so) but it is interesting to see the total lack of coverage it has gotten. His team is winning, not him.

This is a good analogy. The Defense is starting to grasp the zone blitz and playing better. They have also benifitted from playing the mediocrities on their schedule.

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Hoss you're too smart not to see why Tebow is dominating coverage. Ratings. Hardcore fans might care about Skelton but until he turns into a virgin and puts a halo on his head he'll never get equal airtime.

It has always been this way and Tebow isn't going to change it.

You're 100% right. The Tebow thing was a good story. Like most things ESPN does, they totally overdid it, so it almost caused you to root against him . My issue isn't with Tebow at all, although he plays it up a bit. It's with the people who took what ESPN was feeding them as gospel.

Originally Posted by 3kings

This is a good analogy. The Defense is starting to grasp the zone blitz and playing better. They have also benifitted from playing the mediocrities on their schedule.

Yep. You're always going to look better when you play sh.itty teams.

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

I figured this was coming. I stick by what I said. All of it.

even the part that was already proven wrong?

Hilarious. You implied that I am stupid for saying KC could turn it on and win games. Then KC beats the previously undefeated Packers. But you still think KC can't win games. Makes sense, Riot.

At least you had a few days before this past Sunday to think you were right.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

even the part that was already proven wrong?

Hilarious. You implied that I am stupid for saying KC could turn it on and win games. Then KC beats the previously undefeated Packers. But you still think KC can't win games. Makes sense, Riot.

At least you had a few days before this past Sunday to think you were right.

low blow

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

even the part that was already proven wrong?

Hilarious. You implied that I am stupid for saying KC could turn it on and win games. Then KC beats the previously undefeated Packers. But you still think KC can't win games. Makes sense, Riot.

At least you had a few days before this past Sunday to think you were right.

No, I implied you were stupid for entering into a conversation and arguing about something you knew little about. That much was proven true the other day.

As for your prediction. No sh.it any team in the NFL can win any game. Am I supposed to be blown away by stating the obvious? They aren't a good team. And beating the Packers didn't make them a good team, especially coming off a 27 point loss to the Jets. That's the NFL. Anybody can beat anybody.

That's been the whole point. It's foolish to just look at one thing, which is what you are doing. Obviously the Chiefs aren't as good as the Packers. But for one day they were. It's fine to look at the fact that the Broncos were winning. But it was (and still is) shortsighted to not acknowledge one of the reasons they looked good and were winning was because of their competition. Those things like important players not playing was not the sole reason. But it was part of it.

I just figured these things would be obvious. Especially to someone who follows the NFL so closely.

[Antitrust32]

what was proven true? that I don't follow the Texans? solid proof, buddy.


I just find it terrifically awesome that the one thing you cherry picked from my arguement... the Chiefs.. came out and beat the Packers.

Maybe karma took a flight from denver to Kansas City.

[Antitrust32]

I'll make a reversal and agree with you that the Jets suck though. Who does Holmes think he is mocking the opposing team that is downright beating your as.s?

I just really really really really need them to beat the Giants next weekend. Go Rex!

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

I'll make a reversal and agree with you that the Jets suck though. Who does Holmes think he is mocking the opposing team that is downright beating your as.s?

I just really really really really need them to beat the Giants next weekend. Go Rex!

It's pretty rich for a fan of the Eagles to complain about an opposing player being unsportsmanlike.

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

what was proven true? that I don't follow the Texans? solid proof, buddy.


I just find it terrifically awesome that the one thing you cherry picked from my arguement... the Chiefs.. came out and beat the Packers.

Maybe karma took a flight from denver to Kansas City.

The fact that this is what you took out of the entire back and forth is pretty funny.

I guess ignorance really is bliss.