I asked him a direct question first. Wiphan refused to answer. Why? Then he changed the subject and conned you into jumping on that changed-subject bandwagon.
Nice to know you have "rules" about "why don't you just answer" that you apply differently, depending upon who is doing the asking
Poor you. Stomp your feet and throw a fit, but you'll just have to re-read the thread, like Wiphan, if you want to rehash what's already been discussed to death about the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
On the other hand, Wiphan accused me of not admitting I said Prosser would be charged, and he was wasn't. Not true. You both refuse to look again at the thread where I said that. But I guess that's why Wiphan is so desperate to change the subject and make the attack about me. To get the emphasis off that nonsense. You're a good sheeple for Wiphan
If you both turn and attack me loudly enough, perhaps we can forget that Wiphan makes accusations that can't stand up to scrutiny? LOL
Geesh, you righties are pathetically transparent.
Now, on the other hand, "Walkergate" seems to be becoming more interesting day by day.
09-22-2011, 11:47 AM
Threaded Mode