Michelle Bachmann

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

that isnt a good reason to close the room though. It says "politics/society" so you know what you are going to get when you click the link. some people enjoy bitching about political opinions. i kind of enjoy getting Riot all riled up.

I'm all about the least amount of censorship as possible.

I'm for the least amount of censorship also. But it's a horse racing board. There is more "discussion" about this sh.it than people talking about racing. Probably not what Byk had in mind when he started the board.

The two boards I read aren't helped out by the politics rooms, they take away from the board.

I'll ask again, do people go to political forums to discuss horse racing?

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

I'm for the least amount of censorship also. But it's a horse racing board. There is more "discussion" about this sh.it than people talking about racing. Probably not what Byk had in mind when he started the board.

The two boards I read aren't helped out by the politics rooms, they take away from the board.

I'll ask again, do people go to political forums to discuss horse racing?

how do they possibly take away from the board? you have to click on the link and if you click that means you want to view it.

Byk doesnt give a crap about the politics section.

why would people not talk politics if there is a section called "politics?" it takes nothing away from all the other subforums.

its purely your opinion, which i strongly disagree with.


the only thing that takes away from the horse racing board, IMO, is the lack of good racing. Shoot, I watched the ESPY's last night and it showed Zenyatta's second place finish like 5 times, but no other races and no mention of Blame, the winner of the race. That says something about the state of horse racing in 2011.