![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I thought the main gripe about both Dialed In's classic efforts was that he was kept too far off the pace.
Not saying I buy into that, but it seemed to be an acceptable excuse for Animal Kingdom's Preakness loss, so why not Dialed In? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
To me - the weird horse is Shakleford. He's only run two decent races in his entire life - the Florida Derby and Preakness - and both times they absolutely let him rip early on. Shakleford's Kentucky Derby 4th was a terrible performance because of the pace - and his Belmont performance was equally terrible - basically he hated the restraint and the two piece of sh!t who sat 2nd and 3rd behind him (Ruler On Ice and Stay Thirsty I believe are the names of those two horses) inherited the lead and winning exacta when he stopped. I was telling people before the Belmont: "If Castanon doesn't have 15 on this field in a blink of an eye - he's riding his horse wrong. That horse runs like sh!t when they try to nurse his speed - and when he goes fast - at least he pulls everyone behind him out of their comfort zone all the way back through the deepest closers in the race" |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Because AK won the Kentucky Derby and almost won the Preakness, while Dialed In's best race out of those two was a sh!tty suck up in the Derby?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wasn't Dialed In nearly 20 lengths back of the slowest paced Derby in decades?
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wait for it.....But AK was dead last and somehow won.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Animal Kingdom wasn't dead last in the Derby.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I thought at one point he was. Maybe I am thinking of the Preakness
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
He was never dead last in there either.
|