SCOTUS Justice Clarence Thomas lied

[dellinger63]

if he recuses himself surely Sotomayer should as well and then it's just a yes/no cancel out. I think they should both stay and in fact write the majority/minority opinions. This comes down to Kennedy.

Nothng more than another attempt for the Dems to jam it home to the taxpayer. Obamacare will save a few and kill the rest. Kind of like fixing a door handle while the engine light is on, the engine is knocking bad and smoke is starting to come out.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

if he recuses himself surely Sotomayer should as well and then it's just a yes/no cancel out.

Why? When did Sotomayer deliberately lie for five years professionally?

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

When did Sotomayer

Sorry meant Kagan.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Sorry meant Kagan.

When did Kagan deliberately lie for five years during her professional government employment?

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

When did Kagan deliberately lie for five years during her professional government employment?

It has nothing to do with knowing every financial detail for a spouse and everything to do with any opinions she had foreseeing/preparing for suits, in her role as Soliciter General, against the unconstitutional obamacare. I think this has everything to do with race!

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

It has nothing to do with knowing every financial detail for a spouse and everything to do with any opinions she had foreseeing/preparing for suits, in her role as Soliciter General, against the unconstitutional obamacare. I think this has everything to do with race!

Clarence Thomas' lying on his SCOTUS financial disclosure forms regarding his wife's earnings, for five years in a row, hasn't much to do with his race.

It has to do with his lying. Are you okay with a Justice of the Supreme Court doing that, or not?

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

It has to do with his lying. Are you okay with a Justice of the Supreme Court doing that, or not?

If say emails between him and wife and or accountant regarding hiding by omission were found or his accountant came foward then yes I have a problem and yes at a minimum he should recuse himself. Right now it's a mistake.