![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Bin Laden happy to be dead to miss that circus
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Just curious. How do you make a draw like that more exciting? Secondly, I think you got the point across on your first couple of post. Lastly, if it was so dreadful, why did you keep watching?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Go Pats
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() There's a lot they can do to make it more exciting or interesting. And if they insist on keeping it that dull, then don't bother trying to televise it or promote it. Just do it in 5 minutes and move on with it.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Wow. Ok. But you kept watching. I think it served it's purpose. If someone can tell me how pulling a number out of a plastic bottle and then assigning a horse to it can be more exciting then please do. It's pretty standard stuff.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Asher + Leopard Thong
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() by using cut aways and other "movie magic"...there's shows about freaking grocery shopping on tv that draw ratings...ANYTHING can get attention if promoted well
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Is this the first Derby draw you've seen? For quite a few years, ESPN did it five horses at a time. I thought it was significantly more painless now than it was then.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Pat I need an update on Sweet Ducky's condition stat.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I'll take that as a "yes, this is the first Derby draw I've watched on television."
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Did I hear Battaglia say Twice the Appeal is 20-1 strictly because Borel is on him? Does that seem irresponsible to anybody else?
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs." |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() No. You don't think the horse is going to take money simply because Borel is on him?
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Of course he is, but at 50-1, I would consider playing the horse in some form or fashion even with the Borel bump. But at 20-1, what's the point? Just seems odd to hear an oddsmaker say he took a horse from 50-1 to 20-1 strictly because of a jockey.
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs." |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Battaglia's job in posting the ML is to estimate the public's view, not give his opinion of a given horse's chances. The fact that Borel is on the horse will undoubtedly bring his odds down.
__________________
"Always be yourself...unless you suck!" |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Absolutely not. He is almost surely right in guessing that the horse will take a ton more money simply because of the jockey. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]() It's fine, I just hate seeing a horse who could be a juicy longshot at 20-1 on the m/l rather than the number he probably deserved.
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs." |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I talked to Asher tonight about the long pauses in the draw. Apparently he had to wait for the guys on Versus to finish their schpiel on each horse. Thought it was annoying too.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() some things just aren't meant for t.v.
|